Carlsson Anna, Horion Stefan, Davidsson Johan, Schick Sylvia, Linder Astrid, Hell Wolfram, Svensson Mats Y
Chalmers Industrial Technology (Chalmers Industriteknik), Gothenburg, Sweden.
Institute for Legal Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021 Jun 8;9:684003. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.684003. eCollection 2021.
The objective of this study was to assess the biomechanical and kinematic responses of female volunteers with two different head restraint (HR) configurations when exposed to a low-speed rear loading environment. A series of rear impact sled tests comprising eight belted, near 50th percentile female volunteers, seated on a simplified laboratory seat, was performed with a mean sled acceleration of 2.1 g and a velocity change of 6.8 km/h. Each volunteer underwent two tests; the first test configuration, HR10, was performed at the initial HR distance ∼10 cm and the second test configuration, HR15, was performed at ∼15 cm. Time histories, peak values and their timing were derived from accelerometer data and video analysis, and response corridors were also generated. The results were separated into three different categories, HR10 ( = 8), HR15 ( = 6), and HR15 ( = 2), based on: (1) the targeted initial HR distance [10 cm or 15 cm] and (2) whether the volunteers' head had made contact with the HR [Contact (C) or No Contact (NC)] during the test event. The results in the three categories deviated significantly. The greatest differences were found for the average peak head angular displacements, ranging from 10° to 64°. Furthermore, the average neck injury criteria (NIC) value was 22% lower in HR10 (3.9 m/s), and 49% greater in HR15 (7.4 m/s) in comparison to HR15 (5.0 m/s). This study supplies new data suitable for validation of mechanical or mathematical models of a 50th percentile female. A model of a 50th percentile female remains to be developed and is urgently required to complement the average male models to enhance equality in safety assessments. Hence, it is important that future protection systems are developed and evaluated with female properties taken into consideration too. It is likely that the HR15 test configuration is close to the limit for avoiding HR contact for this specific seat setup. Using both datasets (HR15 and HR15 ), each with its corresponding HR contact condition, will be possible in future dummy or model evaluation.
本研究的目的是评估女性志愿者在两种不同头枕(HR)配置下,暴露于低速后向加载环境时的生物力学和运动学响应。对八名系安全带、接近第50百分位的女性志愿者进行了一系列后向碰撞雪橇试验,她们坐在一个简化的实验室座椅上,雪橇平均加速度为2.1g,速度变化为6.8km/h。每位志愿者都进行了两次测试;第一次测试配置HR10,在初始HR距离约10cm时进行,第二次测试配置HR15,在约15cm时进行。从加速度计数据和视频分析中得出时间历程、峰值及其出现时间,并生成响应走廊。根据以下因素将结果分为三类:HR10(n = 8)、HR15(n = 6)和HR15(n = 2):(1)目标初始HR距离[10cm或15cm];(2)在测试过程中志愿者的头部是否与HR接触[接触(C)或未接触(NC)]。这三类结果有显著差异。平均头部峰值角位移差异最大,范围为10°至64°。此外,与HR15(5.0m/s²)相比,HR10(3.9m/s²)的平均颈部损伤标准(NIC)值低22%,HR15(7.4m/s²)高49%。本研究提供了适用于验证第50百分位女性机械或数学模型的新数据。第50百分位女性模型仍有待开发,迫切需要补充平均男性模型以提高安全评估的平等性。因此,未来开发和评估保护系统时考虑女性特性也很重要。对于这种特定的座椅设置,HR15测试配置可能接近避免头部与HR接触的极限。在未来的假人或模型评估中,使用两个数据集(HR15和HR15)及其相应的HR接触条件将成为可能。