[Prognosis assessment of esophageal atresia: our experience of 29 years].

INTRODUCTION

The major advances in neonatal intensive care have made less useful the Waterston's criteria for esophageal atresia (EA) and/or tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF), and other prognostic classifications have been reported. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of various parameters on the outcome of EA-TEF.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We reviewed 97 cases admitted in our hospital for 29 years. We divided the cases in two groups in relation to the improvement of our neonatal unit care during the years: 1st. 1971-1982 (n = 46); 2nd. 1983-1999 (n = 51). chi 2 squared test and logistic regression analysis of the influence of several parameters before surgical treatment (Waterston's and Spitz's birth weight groups, pneumonia, ventilator dependence, severity of associated anomalies and cardiac malformations) on mortality was performed.

RESULTS

The survival rate increased since 1983, reaching 86.2% in the last 10 years, although the number of neonates with birth weight < 1500 g has increased. Association with a major anomaly increased the mortality significantly in the 2nd. group only (45.5% major vs 7.1% minor and 8.3% none). The cardiac malformations were the most common, not only before 1983 (26.8%), but also since then (31.3%). When the neonate associated a major cardiac malformation the mortality was significantly higher in the 2nd. group (71.4%). The mortality, when pneumonia was present, was significantly higher before 1983 only (75% vs 32.4%), whereas the mortality was significantly increased by the need of ventilator in the 2nd. group only (85.7% vs 9.1%). Before 1983, the best prognostic parameters were the pneumonia and the severity of associated anomalies, whereas only the ventilator dependence was selected between 1983 and 1999.

CONCLUSIONS

The EA-TEF mortality has decreased in the last years. The associated cardiac malformation is the most common. We think that the ventilator dependence is the most reliable prognostic risk factor, showing a poor physiologic status of the neonate.