Nathan Robert A
University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2003 Feb;90(2):182-90; quiz 190-1, 232. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62138-2.
To review the mechanisms and clinical efficacy of leukotriene receptor antagonists, which are investigational therapies for allergic rhinitis, compared with intranasal corticosteroids and nonsedating antihistamines, which are the most commonly prescribed pharmacotherapies for allergic rhinitis.
Computer-assisted MEDLINE searches for articles and manual searches of conference proceedings on intranasal corticosteroid, antihistamine, leukotriene receptor antagonist, leukotriene modifier, zafirlukast, montelukast, allergic rhinitis, rhinitis, and asthma.
Published articles and pertinent abstracts on the topics identified above were selected. Head-to-head comparator trials as well as data from placebo-controlled trials were selected.
The studies published to date demonstrate that leukotriene receptor antagonists are sometimes more effective than placebo, are no more effective than nonsedating antihistamines, and are less effective than intranasal corticosteroids in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. The combination of a leukotriene receptor antagonist and an antihistamine has not been proven to be more effective than either agent alone. This review reveals several inconsistencies that require resolution. First, whereas leukotriene receptor antagonists are predicted on the basis of their mechanism of action to improve nasal congestion significantly, clinical studies reveal leukotriene receptor antagonists to be no better than antihistamines at improving congestion. Second, leukotriene receptor antagonists would not be expected on the basis of their putative mechanism of action or nasal challenge data to improve significantly sneezing, nasal itching, or drainage. However, some studies show improvement in these symptoms during treatment with leukotriene receptor antagonists. Considered in aggregate, the data available to date do not clearly support a unique role of leukotriene receptor antagonists in the treatment of allergic rhinitis whether or not it is accompanied by asthma.
回顾白三烯受体拮抗剂作为变应性鼻炎研究性治疗方法的作用机制和临床疗效,并与变应性鼻炎最常用的药物治疗方法鼻用糖皮质激素和非镇静性抗组胺药进行比较。
通过计算机辅助检索MEDLINE数据库获取相关文章,并手动检索关于鼻用糖皮质激素、抗组胺药、白三烯受体拮抗剂、白三烯调节剂、扎鲁司特、孟鲁司特、变应性鼻炎、鼻炎和哮喘的会议论文集。
选取已发表的关于上述主题的文章及相关摘要。选取直接比较的对照试验以及安慰剂对照试验的数据。
迄今发表的研究表明,白三烯受体拮抗剂在治疗变应性鼻炎时,有时比安慰剂更有效,不比非镇静性抗组胺药更有效,且比鼻用糖皮质激素效果差。白三烯受体拮抗剂与抗组胺药联合使用尚未被证明比单独使用任何一种药物更有效。本综述揭示了几个需要解决的不一致之处。首先,尽管根据白三烯受体拮抗剂的作用机制预计其能显著改善鼻充血,但临床研究表明,白三烯受体拮抗剂在改善充血方面并不比抗组胺药更好。其次,基于其假定的作用机制或鼻激发试验数据,预计白三烯受体拮抗剂不会显著改善打喷嚏、鼻痒或流涕症状。然而,一些研究显示在使用白三烯受体拮抗剂治疗期间这些症状有所改善。综合考虑,迄今为止可得的数据并未明确支持白三烯受体拮抗剂在治疗变应性鼻炎(无论是否伴有哮喘)中的独特作用。