Allen Theresa M, Sapra Puja, Moase Elaine, Moreira João, Iden Debrah
Department of Pharmacology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2H7, Canada.
J Liposome Res. 2002 Feb-May;12(1-2):5-12. doi: 10.1081/lpr-120004771.
An overview of our experiences in the field of immunoliposomal anticancer drugs is provided with respect to choice of ligand, and choice of model system, in order to provide some guidance as to the rational use of this new technology. Liposomes targeted by either peptide or monoclonal antibodies showed significantly higher binding to their respective target cells in vitro compared to non-targeted liposomes in all model systems examined. This higher binding led to higher cytotoxicities relative to non-targeted liposomes. For the immunoliposomes to deliver their entrapped drug to target cell in vivo, long circulations half-lives are required. We have evaluated the pharmacokinetics of liposomes prepared by several different coupling techniques, and have found significant differences in the clearance of these immunoliposomes from the circulation. Immunoliposomes prepared with whole anti-CD19 IgG coupled by the Mal-PEG-DSPE method demonstrated a short plasma half-life, which may reflect the random orientation of the MAb on the liposome surface. Coupling methods that mask or eliminate the Fc region result in immunoliposomes that have clearance rates more similar to untargeted liposomes. Insertion of peptides or antibodies into pre-formed liposomes through incubation with ligand-coupled PEG micelles resulted in immunoliposomes, termed post-insertion liposomes, that demonstrated comparable in vitro binding, pharmacokinetic profiles and in vivo therapeutic efficacy to liposomes made by conventional coupling methods. The therapeutic efficacy of liposomes, prepared by various coupling methods and targeted by different ligands, was compared in several different animal models of either haematological malignancies, pseudometastatic disease or solid tumours. In our hands, successful in vivo targeting has been obtained when the target is either small or readily accessible from the vasculature, where the liposomes have longer circulating half-lives and/or where a ligand against an internalizing epitope has been chosen. These results should aid in the rational design of applications for immunoliposomal drugs in the future.
本文就免疫脂质体抗癌药物领域的经验进行了概述,涉及配体的选择和模型系统的选择,以便为合理使用这项新技术提供一些指导。在所有检测的模型系统中,与非靶向脂质体相比,由肽或单克隆抗体靶向的脂质体在体外对各自靶细胞的结合显著更高。这种更高的结合导致相对于非靶向脂质体具有更高的细胞毒性。为了使免疫脂质体在体内将包裹的药物递送至靶细胞,需要较长的循环半衰期。我们评估了通过几种不同偶联技术制备的脂质体的药代动力学,发现这些免疫脂质体从循环中的清除存在显著差异。通过Mal-PEG-DSPE方法偶联全抗CD19 IgG制备的免疫脂质体显示血浆半衰期较短,这可能反映了单克隆抗体在脂质体表面的随机取向。掩盖或消除Fc区的偶联方法导致免疫脂质体的清除率更类似于非靶向脂质体。通过与配体偶联的PEG胶束孵育将肽或抗体插入预先形成的脂质体中,产生了称为后插入脂质体的免疫脂质体,其在体外结合、药代动力学特征和体内治疗效果方面与通过传统偶联方法制备的脂质体相当。在几种不同的血液系统恶性肿瘤、假转移疾病或实体瘤动物模型中,比较了通过各种偶联方法制备并由不同配体靶向的脂质体的治疗效果。在我们的研究中,当靶标较小或易于从脉管系统接近时,在脂质体具有较长循环半衰期和/或选择了针对内化表位的配体的情况下,已实现体内成功靶向。这些结果应有助于未来免疫脂质体药物应用的合理设计。