Suppr超能文献

渥太华膝关节规则:医生与分诊护士对膝关节损伤X线检查决策规则的应用比较。

Ottawa Knee Rule: a comparison of physician and triage-nurse utilization of a decision rule for knee injury radiography.

作者信息

Matteucci Michael John, Roos Joel Andrew

机构信息

Emergency Medicine Department, Naval Medical Center, Portsmouth, Virginia 23708-2197, USA.

出版信息

J Emerg Med. 2003 Feb;24(2):147-50. doi: 10.1016/s0736-4679(02)00716-3.

Abstract

The Ottawa Knee Rule (OKR) is a clinical decision rule for the ordering of knee radiographs by physicians in patients with blunt knee injuries. However, in many Emergency Departments, radiographs are also ordered by nurses during triage. This study was designed to compare application of the OKR by triage nurses and physicians. A consecutive sample of all patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) of a tertiary care military teaching hospital with blunt knee injuries that met OKR inclusion criteria were enrolled. Radiographs were ordered on all patients. Nurses and physicians were blinded to each other's examinations. Nurse-physician inter-reviewer reliability was compared using the kappa statistic. Of 172 enrolled subjects, 38 were excluded for incomplete data or multiple entries, leaving 134 study patients. Four fractures (3%) were detected. Fair inter-observer reliability was found on four of the five OKR components: patellar tenderness (PT, kappa = 0.31), proximal fibula tenderness (PFT, kappa = 0.31), inability to flex > 90 degrees (FLEX, kappa = 0.24) and inability to walk four steps (WALK, kappa = 0.44). Nurses were more likely to overestimate the presence of individual components (PT 3.5x, PFT 6.6x, FLEX 1.9x and WALK 4.8x) and were 3.6 times more likely than Emergency Physicians (EP), overall, to order radiographs, representing a 21% vs. 37% reduced radiography rate, respectively. No fractures were missed by physicians or nurses. Triage nurses and EPs in this study had fair agreement in their application of the OKR. Triage nurses greatly overestimated knee injuries, while maintaining sensitivity, at the expense of specificity and cost savings.

摘要

渥太华膝关节规则(OKR)是医生用于为钝性膝关节损伤患者开具膝关节X光片的临床决策规则。然而,在许多急诊科,分诊期间护士也会开具X光片。本研究旨在比较分诊护士和医生对OKR的应用情况。纳入了一家三级护理军事教学医院急诊科所有因钝性膝关节损伤就诊且符合OKR纳入标准的连续样本患者。所有患者均进行了X光检查。护士和医生对彼此的检查结果不知情。使用kappa统计量比较护士与医生之间的审查者间可靠性。在172名纳入的受试者中,38名因数据不完整或重复录入被排除,最终留下134名研究患者。共检测到4例骨折(3%)。在OKR的五个组成部分中的四个方面发现了中等的观察者间可靠性:髌骨压痛(PT,kappa = 0.31)、腓骨近端压痛(PFT,kappa = 0.31)、无法屈曲超过90度(FLEX,kappa = 0.24)以及无法行走四步(WALK,kappa = 0.44)。护士更有可能高估各个组成部分的存在情况(PT高估3.5倍、PFT高估6.6倍、FLEX高估1.9倍、WALK高估4.8倍),总体而言,护士开具X光片的可能性比急诊医生(EP)高3.6倍,X光检查率分别降低了21%和37%。医生和护士均未漏诊骨折。本研究中的分诊护士和急诊医生在应用OKR方面有中等程度的一致性。分诊护士在保持敏感性的同时极大地高估了膝关节损伤情况,但牺牲了特异性和成本效益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验