Suppr超能文献

在接受强化胰岛素治疗方案的 1 型糖尿病青少年中,甘精胰岛素加赖脯胰岛素或中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素加正规人胰岛素的随机交叉试验。

Randomized cross-over trial of insulin glargine plus lispro or NPH insulin plus regular human insulin in adolescents with type 1 diabetes on intensive insulin regimens.

作者信息

Murphy Nuala P, Keane Suzanne M, Ong Ken K, Ford-Adams Martha, Edge Julie A, Acerini Carlo L, Dunger David B

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2003 Mar;26(3):799-804. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.3.799.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare blood glucose control and incidence of nocturnal hypoglycemia in adolescents with type 1 diabetes on multiple injection regimens managed with either an insulin analog combination or NPH insulin plus regular human insulin.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In a randomized cross-over study, 28 adolescents with type 1 diabetes on multiple injection therapy received either insulin glargine prebedtime plus lispro preprandially (LIS/GLAR) or NPH insulin prebedtime plus regular human insulin preprandially (R/NPH). During each 16-week treatment arm, subjects completed home blood glucose profiles, and at the end of each treatment arm, they were admitted for an overnight metabolic profile. A total of 25 subjects completed the study.

RESULTS

Compared with R/NPH therapy, LIS/GLAR was associated with lower mean blood glucose levels (LIS/GLAR versus R/NPH): fasting (8.0 vs. 9.2 mmol/l, P < 0.0001), 2 h postbreakfast (8.1 vs. 10.7 mmol/l, P < 0.0005), prelunch (8.9 vs. 10.1 mmol/l, P < 0.01), and 2 h postlunch (8.0 vs. 9.5 mmol/l, P < 0.002). However, there was no difference in mean blood glucose levels before or after the evening meal. Incidence of nocturnal hypoglycemia on overnight profiles was 43% lower on LIS/GLAR compared with R/NPH therapy; however, there was no difference in rates of self-reported symptomatic hypoglycemia. Total insulin dose required to achieve target blood glucose control was lower on LIS/GLAR (1.16 IU/kg) compared with R/NPH therapy (1.26 IU/kg, P < 0.005), but there was no significant difference in HbA(1c) levels (LIS/GLAR versus R/NPH: 8.7 vs. 9.1%, P = 0.13).

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy with insulin glargine plus lispro reduced the incidence of nocturnal hypoglycemia and was at least as effective as R/NPH insulin therapy in maintaining glycemic control in adolescents on multiple injection regimens.

摘要

目的

比较采用胰岛素类似物联合治疗或中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素(NPH)加普通胰岛素治疗的1型糖尿病青少年患者的血糖控制情况及夜间低血糖发生率。

研究设计与方法

在一项随机交叉研究中,28例接受多次注射治疗的1型糖尿病青少年患者,分别接受睡前甘精胰岛素加餐前赖脯胰岛素(LIS/GLAR)治疗或睡前NPH胰岛素加餐前普通胰岛素(R/NPH)治疗。在每个为期16周的治疗阶段,受试者完成家庭血糖监测,在每个治疗阶段结束时,他们入院进行过夜代谢监测。共有25例受试者完成了研究。

结果

与R/NPH治疗相比,LIS/GLAR治疗的平均血糖水平更低(LIS/GLAR与R/NPH比较):空腹血糖(8.0对9.2 mmol/L,P<0.0001)、早餐后2小时血糖(8.1对10.7 mmol/L,P<0.0005)、午餐前血糖(8.9对10.1 mmol/L,P<0.01)以及午餐后2小时血糖(8.0对9.5 mmol/L,P<0.002)。然而,晚餐前后的平均血糖水平无差异。过夜监测时,LIS/GLAR治疗的夜间低血糖发生率比R/NPH治疗低43%;然而,自我报告的有症状低血糖发生率无差异。与R/NPH治疗(1.26 IU/kg,P<0.005)相比,LIS/GLAR治疗达到目标血糖控制所需的总胰岛素剂量更低(1.16 IU/kg),但糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平无显著差异(LIS/GLAR与R/NPH比较:8.7%对9.1%,P = 0.13)。

结论

甘精胰岛素加赖脯胰岛素联合治疗降低了夜间低血糖的发生率,并且在多次注射治疗方案中,对于维持青少年血糖控制,其效果至少与R/NPH胰岛素治疗相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验