Suppr超能文献

优泌乐混合制剂每日多次注射疗法与分别注射赖脯胰岛素和中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素对1型糖尿病成年患者的疗效比较

Effects of multiple daily injection therapy with Humalog mixtures versus separately injected insulin lispro and NPH insulin in adults with type I diabetes mellitus.

作者信息

Roach Paris, Bai Shan, Charbonnel Bernard, Consoli Agostino, Taboga Claudio, Tiengo Antonio, Bolli Geremia

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, 545 Barnhill Drive, EH 421, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2004 Apr;26(4):502-10. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(04)90052-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Injection of insulin lispro (LP) before meals provides a more physiologic insulin activity profile than regular human insulin, but the relatively short duration of action of LP may allow the blood glucose (BG) level to increase during the late postprandial period (4-7 hours after meals) unless basal insulin is optimally replaced. One approach to basal insulin optimization has been to combine small doses of NPH with LP before meals. When used in a similar fashion, premixed, fixed-ratio insulin preparations containing LP and NPL (an LP-based intermediate-acting insulin) may provide the basis for an optimized basal-bolus insulin regimen.

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed mean late postprandial glycemic control during treatment with a premixed formulation consisting of a high proportion of LP (75% LP/25% NPL; H) and a premixed formulation consisting of a medium proportion of LP (50% LP/50% NPL; M). The H/M formulation was given before meals and was compared with treatment with preprandial LP + NPH (LP + N) in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM).

METHODS

This multicenter, randomized, open-label, 2-period crossover study was conducted at 4 centers in Italy and 1 center in France. Patients eligible for the study had type 1 DM, were > or = 18 years of age, and had a glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) <150% of the upper limit of normal. Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatment sequences: LP self-mixed with NPH before meals plus NPH alone at bedtime for 8 weeks (LP + N) followed by preprandial H or M, plus NPH alone at bedtime for 8 weeks (H/M), or the opposite sequence. Assessments included 8-point self-monitored BG profiles, HbA(1c), and hypoglycemia (any sign or symptom of hypoglycemia or BG < 3.0 mmol/L [<54.0 mg/dL]). The primary outcome measure was the late postprandial BG value, calculated as the mean of the combined prelunch (late postbreakfast), predinner (late postlunch), and bedtime (late postdinner) values.

RESULTS

A total of 89 patients with type 1 DM were enrolled (44 men, 45 women; mean [SD] age, 38.3 [12.8] years; mean [SD] body weight, 70.8 [11.6] kg; mean [SD] body mass index, 24.6 [3.0] kg/m(2); mean [SD] duration of diabetes, 17.8 [10.5] years; mean HbA(1c), 7.9% [0.88%]). The mean (SD) late postprandial BG values were similar between treatments (8.9 [2.1] mmol/L [160.3 (37.8) mg/dL] for H/M vs 9.0 [1.8] mmol/L [162.1 (32.4) mg/dL] for LP + N), as were the end point HbA(1c) values (7.8% [0.9%] for H/M vs 7.9% [0.8%] for LP + N). The rate of hypoglycemia was significantly higher during treatment with H/M, primarily because of episodes occurring between 12 PM and 6 PM, but was relatively low in both groups (mean/median rate per patient per 30 days: 2.87/2.14 for H/M and 2.11/1.07 for LP + N; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this population of patients with type 1 DM, preprandial H/M provided an effective alternative regimen for prandial and basal insulin replacement. Late postprandial BG control, an indicator of basal insulin sufficiency, was similar to that achieved with an intensified regimen of LP + N injected separately before meals, and the end point HbA(1c) was similar between the 2 treatments.

摘要

背景

与常规人胰岛素相比,餐时注射赖脯胰岛素(LP)可提供更符合生理的胰岛素活性曲线,但LP作用持续时间相对较短,除非基础胰岛素得到最佳替代,否则餐后晚期(餐后4 - 7小时)血糖(BG)水平可能会升高。优化基础胰岛素的一种方法是在餐时将小剂量的中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素(NPH)与LP联合使用。以类似方式使用时,含有LP和NPL(一种基于LP的中效胰岛素)的预混固定比例胰岛素制剂可能为优化的基础 - 餐时胰岛素方案提供基础。

目的

本研究评估了高比例LP(75% LP/25% NPL;H)预混制剂和中比例LP(50% LP/50% NPL;M)预混制剂治疗期间的餐后晚期平均血糖控制情况。将H/M制剂在餐时给药,并与1型糖尿病(DM)患者的餐时LP + NPH(LP + N)治疗进行比较。

方法

这项多中心、随机、开放标签、两阶段交叉研究在意大利的4个中心和法国的1个中心进行。符合研究条件的患者为1型DM,年龄≥18岁,糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)<正常上限的150%。患者被随机分配到2种治疗顺序中的1种:餐时LP与NPH自行混合加睡前单独使用NPH,共8周(LP + N),随后餐时使用H或M加睡前单独使用NPH,共8周(H/M),或相反顺序。评估包括8点自我监测的BG曲线、HbA1c和低血糖(任何低血糖体征或症状或BG < 3.0 mmol/L [<54.0 mg/dL])。主要结局指标是餐后晚期BG值,计算为午餐前(早餐后晚期)、晚餐前(午餐后晚期)和睡前(晚餐后晚期)值的平均值。

结果

共纳入89例1型DM患者(44例男性,45例女性;平均[标准差]年龄,38.3 [12.8]岁;平均[标准差]体重,70.8 [11.6] kg;平均[标准差]体重指数,24.6 [3.0] kg/m²;平均[标准差]糖尿病病程,17.8 [10.5]年;平均HbA1c,7.9% [0.88%])。各治疗组间餐后晚期BG值的平均值(标准差)相似(H/M组为8.9 [2.1] mmol/L [160.3 (37.8) mg/dL],LP + N组为9.0 [1.8] mmol/L [162.1 (32.4) mg/dL]),终点HbA1c值也相似(H/M组为7.8% [0.9%],LP + N组为7.9% [0.8%])。H/M治疗期间低血糖发生率显著更高,主要是因为中午12点至下午6点期间发生的发作,但两组发生率均相对较低(每位患者每30天的平均/中位数发生率:H/M组为2.87/2.14,LP + N组为2.11/1.07;P < 0.05)。

结论

在这群1型DM患者中,餐时H/M为餐时和基础胰岛素替代提供了一种有效的替代方案。餐后晚期BG控制(基础胰岛素充足的指标)与餐时分别注射LP + N的强化方案相似,且两种治疗的终点HbA1c相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验