• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对于老年高危患者的房颤,心率控制是否优于节律控制?

Is rate control better than rhythm control for atrial fibrillation in older high-risk patients?

作者信息

Saseen Joseph J

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, USA.

出版信息

J Fam Pract. 2003 Mar;52(3):192, 194.

PMID:12620170
Abstract

Mortality with atrial fibrillation is similar with rhythm control and rate control treatment. However, adverse drug events and hospitalizations are more frequent with rhythm control therapy. Rate control therapy for atrial fibrillation should be the primary treatment strategy for an older high-risk population, but should not be extrapolated to younger and healthier patients (eg, patients with lone atrial fibrillation). These findings are consistent with another smaller study of patients with recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation.

摘要

房颤患者采用节律控制和心率控制治疗的死亡率相似。然而,节律控制治疗的药物不良事件和住院情况更为频繁。房颤的心率控制治疗应作为老年高危人群的主要治疗策略,但不应推广至年轻且健康的患者(如孤立性房颤患者)。这些发现与另一项针对复发性持续性房颤患者的规模较小的研究结果一致。

相似文献

1
Is rate control better than rhythm control for atrial fibrillation in older high-risk patients?对于老年高危患者的房颤,心率控制是否优于节律控制?
J Fam Pract. 2003 Mar;52(3):192, 194.
2
Clinical factors that influence response to treatment strategies in atrial fibrillation: the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) study.影响心房颤动治疗策略反应的临床因素:节律管理心房颤动随访研究(AFFIRM)
Am Heart J. 2005 Apr;149(4):645-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.09.038.
3
Rate versus rhythm control in atrial fibrillation.
Ann Pharmacother. 2004 May;38(5):839-44. doi: 10.1345/aph.1D396. Epub 2004 Mar 23.
4
Is there a role for digoxin in atrial fibrillation without heart failure?地高辛在无心力衰竭的心房颤动中是否有作用?
Cardiol J. 2009;16(5):483-6.
5
Atrial fibrillation: pharmacological therapy.心房颤动:药物治疗。
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2011 Mar;36(3):87-120. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2011.01.001.
6
Pharmacological therapy of atrial fibrillation.心房颤动的药物治疗
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999 Aug;47 Suppl 3:334-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1013194.
7
Rate vs rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis.心房颤动患者的心率控制与节律控制:一项荟萃分析。
Arch Intern Med. 2005 Feb 14;165(3):258-62. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.3.258.
8
Randomized trial of rhythm or rate control in atrial fibrillation: the Pharmacological Intervention in Atrial Fibrillation Trial (PIAF).心房颤动节律控制与心率控制的随机试验:心房颤动药物干预试验(PIAF)
Eur Heart J. 2001 May;22(10):801-2. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2001.2596.
9
Atrial fibrillation: rate control often better than rhythm control.心房颤动:心率控制通常优于节律控制。
Prescrire Int. 2004 Apr;13(70):64-9.
10
Atrial fibrillation: rate versus rhythm control.心房颤动:心率控制与节律控制
J Ark Med Soc. 2005 Oct;102(4):110-2.