• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种不同手术技术治疗压力性尿失禁的疗效比较。

Comparison of outcomes of three different surgical techniques performed for stress urinary incontinence.

作者信息

Kilicarslan Hakan, Guvenal Tevfik, Ayan Semih, Gokce Gokhan, Cetin Ali, Gultekin E Yener

机构信息

Departments of Urology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey.

出版信息

Int J Urol. 2003 Mar;10(3):126-30; discussion 131. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-2042.2003.00596.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1442-2042.2003.00596.x
PMID:12622706
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim was to compare the efficacy of Burch colposuspension, transvaginal four-corner bladder neck suspension (FCBNS) and the vaginal wall sling (VWS) procedures in patients with stress urinary incontinence.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 88 patients who underwent Burch colposuspension (n = 20), FCBNS (n = 29) and VWS (n = 39) for stress urinary incontinence. Objective and subjective cure rates at 3 months and annually after the operation were the primary outcome measures.

RESULTS

The patients were similar in age, parity, menopausal status, grade of cystocel and preoperative residual urine volumes. Fourteen out of 20 (70%) patients showed improvement in the group undergoing Burch colposuspension, 29 out of 39 (74.4%) patients showed improvement in the FCBNS group, and 28 out of 29 (96.6%) patients showed improvement in the VWS group. The mean length of follow up was 3.8 years (range 3-5).

CONCLUSION

In this study, the VWS procedure had a higher long-term cure rate of stress urinary incontinence when compared with the Burch colposuspension and the FCBNS procedures.

摘要

背景

目的是比较Burch阴道旁修补术、经阴道四角膀胱颈悬吊术(FCBNS)和阴道壁吊带术(VWS)治疗压力性尿失禁患者的疗效。

方法

对88例因压力性尿失禁接受Burch阴道旁修补术(n = 20)、FCBNS(n = 29)和VWS(n = 39)的患者进行回顾性分析。主要观察指标为术后3个月及每年的客观和主观治愈率。

结果

患者在年龄、产次、绝经状态、膀胱膨出程度和术前残余尿量方面相似。接受Burch阴道旁修补术的20例患者中有14例(70%)病情改善,FCBNS组39例患者中有29例(74.4%)病情改善,VWS组29例患者中有28例(96.6%)病情改善。平均随访时间为3.8年(范围3 - 5年)。

结论

在本研究中,与Burch阴道旁修补术和FCBNS相比,VWS治疗压力性尿失禁的长期治愈率更高。

相似文献

1
Comparison of outcomes of three different surgical techniques performed for stress urinary incontinence.三种不同手术技术治疗压力性尿失禁的疗效比较。
Int J Urol. 2003 Mar;10(3):126-30; discussion 131. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-2042.2003.00596.x.
2
A 5-year follow-up study comparing Burch colposuspension and transobturator tape for the surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence.一项比较Burch阴道悬吊术和经闭孔尿道中段吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁的5年随访研究。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014 Apr;125(1):73-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.09.026. Epub 2013 Dec 14.
3
A surgical technique to adjust bladder neck suspension in laparoscopic Burch colposuspension.一种在腹腔镜下Burch阴道悬吊术中调整膀胱颈悬吊的手术技术。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006 Jul-Aug;13(4):289-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2006.03.019.
4
Comparison of the efficacy of Burch colposuspension, pubovaginal sling, and tension-free vaginal tape for stress urinary incontinence.Burch阴道悬吊术、耻骨后阴道吊带术和无张力阴道吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁的疗效比较
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005 Dec;91(3):246-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.08.023. Epub 2005 Oct 20.
5
[Effects of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension and tension-free vaginal tape in treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a comparative study].[腹腔镜Burch阴道悬吊术与无张力阴道吊带术治疗女性压力性尿失禁的疗效比较研究]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2008 Dec 9;88(45):3192-4.
6
Normal preoperative urodynamic testing does not predict voiding dysfunction after Burch colposuspension versus pubovaginal sling.术前常规尿动力学检查无法预测Burch阴道悬吊术与耻骨后阴道吊带术相比后发生的排尿功能障碍。
J Urol. 2008 Nov;180(5):2076-80. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.07.027. Epub 2008 Sep 18.
7
Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.女性尿失禁的耻骨后开放式阴道悬吊术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(1):CD002912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002912.
8
Surgical management of recurrent stress urinary incontinence: A 12-year experience.复发性压力性尿失禁的手术治疗:12年经验
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Dec;181(6):1296-307; discussion 1307-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70368-6.
9
[Does a Combined Fascial Sling - Burch Colposuspension Display Advantages over a Fascial Sling alone for Treatment of Urinary Stress Incontinence in Females?].[对于女性压力性尿失禁的治疗,联合筋膜悬吊 - 伯奇阴道悬吊术是否比单纯筋膜悬吊术更具优势?]
Aktuelle Urol. 2003 May;34(3):166-71. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-40233.
10
[Burch colposuspension].
Acta Med Port. 2004 Jan-Feb;17(1):15-9. Epub 2004 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Female stress urinary incontinence and the mid-urethral sling: is obstruction necessary to achieve dryness?女性压力性尿失禁与中段尿道吊带术:实现干爽是否需要梗阻?
World J Urol. 2015 Sep;33(9):1243-50. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1600-x. Epub 2015 May 30.
2
Surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a historical review with emphasis on the anterior compartment.盆腔器官脱垂的外科治疗:以阴道前壁脱垂为重点的历史回顾
Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Oct;24(10):1593-602. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2074-2. Epub 2013 Mar 15.