Ismail A H, Young R J
J Clin Psychol. 1976 Apr;32(2):268-73. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197604)32:2<268::aid-jclp2270320213>3.0.co;2-h.
The study investigated the relationship between physical fitness and personality variables at second- and third-order factor-analytic structures. Further, the stability of the factor structures at pre- and post-physical fitness program tests was examined by orthogonal and oblique rotations. Physical fitness and personality data were collected on 56 middle-aged males. The fitness and personality variables were factor analyzed and rotated orthogonally and obliquely by the principal axis form of solution. As a result, five second-order factors were extracted, both initially and finally. Factor scores were estimated for each S on each of the second-order factors, and data were factor analyzed to extract the third-order factors. The second-order factors closely resembled Cattell's factors, but subtle differences were found to exist between initial and final factor structures that may have been due to the influence of the fitness program. Two third-order factors were extracted initially and three finally when the factor scores were rotated orthogonally and obliquely, and physical fitness was associated with two of these hierarchical factors both initially and finally. The hierarchical factor structures appeared to be comparable to the scales of Eysenck. On the basis of the present findings it was concluded that the problem of rotation was not of importance and scientifically uninteresting and that the hierarchical factor solutions were highly stable. Further, it appears that the hierarchical levels of personality are manifested in two syndromes confounded by "traits" and "states" of personality. These two syndromes are Introversion vs. Extraversion and Neuroticism vs. Stability. The extraction of additional factors, such as Low Superego Strength vs. High Superego Strength, as in this study, is completely dependent upon the treatment or conditions superimposed.
该研究在二阶和三阶因素分析结构中调查了身体素质与人格变量之间的关系。此外,通过正交和斜交旋转检验了身体素质计划测试前后因素结构的稳定性。收集了56名中年男性的身体素质和人格数据。对身体素质和人格变量进行因素分析,并通过主轴解法进行正交和斜交旋转。结果,最初和最终都提取了五个二阶因素。为每个二阶因素上的每个个体估计因素得分,并对数据进行因素分析以提取三阶因素。二阶因素与卡特尔的因素非常相似,但发现初始和最终因素结构之间存在细微差异,这可能是由于身体素质计划的影响。当因素得分进行正交和斜交旋转时,最初提取了两个三阶因素,最终提取了三个三阶因素,并且身体素质在最初和最终都与这些层次因素中的两个相关。层次因素结构似乎与艾森克的量表相当。基于目前的研究结果,得出的结论是旋转问题并不重要且在科学上无趣,并且层次因素解决方案高度稳定。此外,人格的层次水平似乎体现在由人格的“特质”和“状态”混淆的两种综合征中。这两种综合征是内向与外向以及神经质与稳定性。如本研究中那样,提取额外的因素,如低超我强度与高超我强度,完全取决于所施加的治疗或条件。