Geller Frank, Ziegler Andreas
Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Hum Hered. 2002;54(3):111-7. doi: 10.1159/000068836.
One well-known approach for the analysis of transmission-disequilibrium is the investigation of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in trios consisting of an affected child and its parents. Results may be biased by erroneously given genotypes. Various reasons, among them sample swap or wrong pedigree structure, represent a possible source for biased results. As these can be partly ruled out by good study conditions together with checks for correct pedigree structure by a series of independent markers, the remaining main cause for errors is genotyping errors. Some of the errors can be detected by Mendelian checks whilst others are compatible with the pedigree structure. The extent of genotyping errors can be estimated by investigating the rate of detected genotyping errors by Mendelian checks. In many studies only one SNP of a specific genomic region is investigated by TDT which leaves Mendelian checks as the only tool to control genotyping errors. From the rate of detected errors the true error rate can be estimated. Gordon et al. [Hum Hered 1999;49:65-70] considered the case of genotyping errors that occur randomly and independently with some fixed probability for the wrong ascertainment of an allele. In practice, instead of single alleles, SNP genotypes are determined. Therefore, we study the proportion of detected errors (detection rate) based on genotypes. In contrast to Gordon et al., who reported detection rates between 25 and 30%, we obtain higher detection rates ranging from 39 up to 61% considering likely error structures in the data. We conclude that detection rates are probably substantially higher than those reported by Gordon et al.
一种用于分析传递不平衡的著名方法是研究由患病儿童及其父母组成的三联体中的单核苷酸多态性(SNP)。结果可能会因错误给定的基因型而产生偏差。各种原因,包括样本交换或错误的家系结构,都是导致结果偏差的可能来源。由于通过良好的研究条件以及使用一系列独立标记检查正确的家系结构可以部分排除这些因素,因此剩余的主要错误原因是基因分型错误。一些错误可以通过孟德尔检验检测到,而其他错误与家系结构兼容。基因分型错误的程度可以通过研究孟德尔检验检测到的基因分型错误率来估计。在许多研究中,TDT仅研究特定基因组区域的一个SNP,这使得孟德尔检验成为控制基因分型错误的唯一工具。根据检测到的错误率可以估计真实错误率。Gordon等人[《人类遗传学》1999年;4:65 - 70]考虑了基因分型错误的情况,即等位基因错误判定以某种固定概率随机且独立发生。在实际中,确定的是SNP基因型而非单个等位基因。因此,我们基于基因型研究检测到的错误比例(检测率)。与Gordon等人报告的25%至30%的检测率不同,考虑到数据中可能的错误结构,我们获得了更高的检测率,范围从39%到61%。我们得出结论,检测率可能大大高于Gordon等人报告的检测率。