Fukuchi Satoshi, Yoshimune Kazuaki, Wakayama Mamoru, Moriguchi Mitsuaki, Nishikawa Ken
Center for Information Biology and DNA Data Bank of Japan, National Institute of Genetics, Yata 1111, Mishima, Shizuoka 411-8540, Japan.
J Mol Biol. 2003 Mar 21;327(2):347-57. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(03)00150-5.
The amino acid compositions of proteins from halophilic archaea were compared with those from non-halophilic mesophiles and thermophiles, in terms of the protein surface and interior, on a genome-wide scale. As we previously reported for proteins from thermophiles, a biased amino acid composition also exists in halophiles, in which an abundance of acidic residues was found on the protein surface as compared to the interior. This general feature did not seem to depend on the individual protein structures, but was applicable to all proteins encoded within the entire genome. Unique protein surface compositions are common in both halophiles and thermophiles. Statistical tests have shown that significant surface compositional differences exist among halophiles, non-halophiles, and thermophiles, while the interior composition within each of the three types of organisms does not significantly differ. Although thermophilic proteins have an almost equal abundance of both acidic and basic residues, a large excess of acidic residues in halophilic proteins seems to be compensated by fewer basic residues. Aspartic acid, lysine, asparagine, alanine, and threonine significantly contributed to the compositional differences of halophiles from meso- and thermophiles. Among them, however, only aspartic acid deviated largely from the expected amount estimated from the dinucleotide composition of the genomic DNA sequence of the halophile, which has an extremely high G+C content (68%). Thus, the other residues with large deviations (Lys, Ala, etc.) from their non-halophilic frequencies could have arisen merely as "dragging effects" caused by the compositional shift of the DNA, which would have changed to increase principally the fraction of aspartic acid alone.
在全基因组范围内,从蛋白质表面和内部方面,对嗜盐古菌的蛋白质氨基酸组成与非嗜盐嗜温菌和嗜热菌的蛋白质氨基酸组成进行了比较。正如我们之前报道的嗜热菌蛋白质一样,嗜盐菌中也存在氨基酸组成偏差,与内部相比,在蛋白质表面发现了大量酸性残基。这一普遍特征似乎并不取决于单个蛋白质结构,而是适用于整个基因组中编码的所有蛋白质。独特的蛋白质表面组成在嗜盐菌和嗜热菌中都很常见。统计测试表明,嗜盐菌、非嗜盐菌和嗜热菌之间存在显著的表面组成差异,而这三种生物各自内部的组成没有显著差异。尽管嗜热菌蛋白质中酸性和碱性残基的丰度几乎相等,但嗜盐菌蛋白质中大量过量的酸性残基似乎由较少的碱性残基来补偿。天冬氨酸、赖氨酸、天冬酰胺、丙氨酸和苏氨酸对嗜盐菌与嗜温菌和嗜热菌的组成差异有显著贡献。然而,其中只有天冬氨酸与根据嗜盐菌基因组DNA序列的二核苷酸组成估计的预期量有很大偏差,该嗜盐菌的G+C含量极高(68%)。因此,其他与非嗜盐菌频率有较大偏差的残基(赖氨酸、丙氨酸等)可能仅仅是由DNA组成变化引起的“拖曳效应”导致的,这种变化主要会增加天冬氨酸的比例。