Moalem Sharon, Percy Maire E
Neurogenetics Laboratory, Surrey Place Centre, Toronto, Canada.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2002 Dec;4(6):531-7. doi: 10.3233/jad-2002-4610.
Modern science has embraced reductionism, seeking ever-smaller parts to explain the whole. Although reductionistic approaches are successful in very simple biological modelling, they are not necessarily appropriate for systems of increasing complexity. Drawing on famous historical examples of how non-reductionist thinking has benefited mankind, and of how reductionism has sometimes led to erroneous conclusions, we call attention to the need to move away from purely linear reasoning in order to succeed in addressing many of the problems we face with the predicted demographic increase in seniors, and the increase in numbers of those afflicted with Alzheimer disease. The time has come to reconsider and seriously question our most basic assumptions and beliefs surrounding what we believe Alzheimer disease to be, without which we run the risk of missed opportunities and failure.
现代科学信奉还原论,试图通过不断细分来解释整体。尽管还原论方法在非常简单的生物建模中取得了成功,但对于日益复杂的系统而言,它们未必适用。借助非还原论思维造福人类的著名历史实例,以及还原论有时如何导致错误结论,我们提请注意,为了成功应对预计老年人口增长以及阿尔茨海默病患者数量增加所带来的诸多问题,有必要摒弃纯粹的线性推理。现在是重新审视并认真质疑我们关于阿尔茨海默病的最基本假设和信念的时候了,否则我们将面临错失机会和失败的风险。