Finazzi-Agrò Enrico, Peppe Antonella, D'Amico Andrea, Petta Filomena, Mazzone Paolo, Stanzione Paolo, Micali Francesco, Caltagirone Carlo
Department of Urology, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.
J Urol. 2003 Apr;169(4):1388-91. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000055520.88377.dc.
Although the effects of subthalamic nucleus stimulation on the control of motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease have been demonstrated, to our knowledge there are no data on effects of this treatment on voiding. We evaluated differences in urodynamic findings in patients with Parkinson's disease during on and off subthalamic nucleus stimulation status.
We evaluated 3 males and 2 females with Parkinson's disease. All patients had undergone surgical bilateral implantation of subthalamic nucleus electrodes 4 to 9 months before our observation. Urodynamic evaluation was performed during chronic subthalamic nucleus stimulation and 30 minutes after turning off the stimulators. Certain parameters were evaluated, including bladder compliance and capacity, first desire to void volume, bladder volume of appearance (reflex volume) and amplitude of detrusor hyperreflexic contractions, maximum flow, detrusor pressure at maximum flow and detrusor-sphincter coordination. Results were compared statistically.
Statistically significant differences in urodynamic data obtained during on and off subthalamic nucleus stimulation status were noted. In particular bladder capacity and reflex volume were increased for on status (median 320 versus 130 ml., p = 0.043 and 250 versus 110, p = 0.043, respectively). The amplitude of detrusor hyperreflexic contractions was decreased for on status but the difference was not significant (median 23 versus 37 cm. H2O, p = 0.223). No differences were noted in the other urodynamic parameters considered during the filling and voiding phases.
Our experience shows that subthalamic nucleus stimulation seems to be effective for decreasing detrusor hyperreflexia in Parkinson's disease cases. This finding confirms a role for basal ganglia in voiding control.
尽管丘脑底核刺激对帕金森病患者运动症状控制的效果已得到证实,但据我们所知,尚无关于该治疗对排尿影响的数据。我们评估了帕金森病患者在丘脑底核刺激开启和关闭状态下尿动力学检查结果的差异。
我们评估了3名男性和2名女性帕金森病患者。所有患者在我们观察前4至9个月均接受了双侧丘脑底核电极植入手术。在慢性丘脑底核刺激期间及关闭刺激器30分钟后进行尿动力学评估。评估了某些参数,包括膀胱顺应性和容量、首次排尿欲望量、膀胱出现容量(反射容量)和逼尿肌反射亢进收缩幅度、最大尿流率、最大尿流率时的逼尿肌压力以及逼尿肌-括约肌协调性。对结果进行统计学比较。
在丘脑底核刺激开启和关闭状态下获得的尿动力学数据存在统计学显著差异。特别是开启状态下膀胱容量和反射容量增加(中位数分别为320对130毫升,p = 0.043;250对110,p = 0.043)。开启状态下逼尿肌反射亢进收缩幅度降低,但差异不显著(中位数23对37厘米水柱,p = 0.223)。在充盈期和排尿期考虑的其他尿动力学参数未发现差异。
我们的经验表明,丘脑底核刺激似乎对降低帕金森病患者的逼尿肌反射亢进有效。这一发现证实了基底神经节在排尿控制中的作用。