Thomason K, West J, Logan R F A, Coupland C, Holmes G K T
Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, UK.
Gut. 2003 Apr;52(4):518-22. doi: 10.1136/gut.52.4.518.
While coeliac disease is now recognised as being associated with both osteoporosis and osteomalacia, the size of any increase in the risk of fracture in patients with coeliac disease compared with the general population has not been quantified.
To examine the fracture experience of adults with coeliac disease compared with the general population.
Patients with coeliac disease diagnosed in adulthood and born before 1950, selected from two large population based disease registers, and age and sex frequency matched controls identified from local general practitioner lists.
A four page lifestyle and general health questionnaire which included specific questions about fracture experience.
Analysis was performed on 244 patients with coeliac disease and 161 controls, giving response rates of 89% and 72%, respectively. Eighty two (35%) coeliac patients and 53 (33%) controls reported ever having sustained one or more fractures, giving an age and sex adjusted odds ratio of 1.05 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-1.62). The most common fracture site reported was the forearm or wrist, with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.21 (95% CI 0.66-2.25) for patients with coeliac disease having had a forearm or wrist fracture. Low trauma fractures were reported by 37 patients with coeliac disease (15.7%) and by 21 controls (13.8%), with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.16 (95% CI 0.65-2.10). The risk of low trauma fracture was slightly higher in coeliac men than women (odds ratio 1.28 compared with 1.12), but this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.84). After adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, and smoking status, patients with coeliac disease reported 13% more low trauma fractures than controls (odds ratio 1.13, 95% CI 0.60-2.12). There was no difference in low trauma fracture risk before and after diagnosis of coeliac disease.
No overall increased fracture risk in patients with coeliac disease was observed. Although severe osteoporosis may develop in a subset of patients, as a whole patients with coeliac disease do not represent a population at particularly high risk of osteoporotic fracture and thus targeting them for osteoporosis screening and treatment is not justified.
虽然现在人们认识到乳糜泻与骨质疏松症和骨软化症都有关联,但与普通人群相比,乳糜泻患者骨折风险增加的幅度尚未得到量化。
研究成年乳糜泻患者与普通人群相比的骨折经历。
从两个基于人群的大型疾病登记处选取1950年以前出生的成年期确诊的乳糜泻患者,并从当地全科医生名单中确定年龄和性别频率匹配的对照。
一份四页的生活方式和总体健康问卷,其中包括关于骨折经历的具体问题。
对244例乳糜泻患者和161例对照进行了分析,应答率分别为89%和72%。82例(35%)乳糜泻患者和53例(33%)对照报告曾发生过一处或多处骨折,年龄和性别调整后的优势比为1.05(95%置信区间(CI)0.68 - 1.62)。报告的最常见骨折部位是前臂或手腕,乳糜泻患者发生前臂或手腕骨折的调整后优势比为1.21(95%CI 0.66 - 2.25)。37例乳糜泻患者(15.7%)和21例对照(13.8%)报告有低创伤性骨折,调整后优势比为1.16(95%CI 0.65 - 2.10)。乳糜泻男性的低创伤性骨折风险略高于女性(优势比为1.28,而女性为1.12),但这种差异无统计学意义(p = 0.84)。在对年龄、性别、体重指数和吸烟状况进行调整后,乳糜泻患者报告的低创伤性骨折比对照多13%(优势比1.13,95%CI 0.60 - 2.12)。乳糜泻诊断前后的低创伤性骨折风险没有差异。
未观察到乳糜泻患者总体骨折风险增加。虽然一部分患者可能会发展为严重骨质疏松症,但总体而言,乳糜泻患者并非骨质疏松性骨折特别高危的人群,因此针对他们进行骨质疏松症筛查和治疗是不合理的。