Barr Dana B, Turner Wayman E, DiPietro Emily, McClure P Cheryl, Baker Samuel E, Barr John R, Gehle Kimberly, Grissom Raymond E, Bravo Roberto, Driskell W Jack, Patterson Donald G, Hill Robert H, Needham Larry L, Pirkle James L, Sampson Eric J
National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Dec;110 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):1085-91. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110s61085.
During the last several years, illegal commercial application of methyl parathion (MP) in domestic settings in several U.S. Southeastern and Midwestern States has affected largely inner-city residents. As part of a multiagency response involving the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), and state and local health departments, our laboratory developed a rapid, high-throughput, selective method for quantifying p-nitrophenol (PNP), a biomarker of MP exposure, using isotope dilution high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. We measured PNP in approximately 16,000 samples collected from residents of seven different states. Using this method, we were able to receive sample batches from each state; prepare, analyze, and quantify the samples for PNP; verify the results; and report the data to the health departments and ATSDR in about 48 hr. These data indicate that many residents had urinary PNP concentrations well in excess of those of the general U.S. population. In fact, their urinary PNP concentrations were more consistent with those seen in occupational settings or in poisoning cases. Although these data, when coupled with other MP metabolite data, suggest that many residents with the highest concentrations of urinary PNP had significant exposure to MP, they do not unequivocally rule out exposure to PNP resulting from environmental degradation of MP. Even with their limitations, these data were used with the assumption that all PNP was derived from MP exposure, which enabled the U.S. EPA and ATSDR to develop a comprehensive, biologically driven response that was protective of human health, especially susceptible populations, and included clinical evaluations, outreach activities, community education, integrated pest management, and decontamination of homes.
在过去几年中,美国东南部和中西部几个州在家庭环境中非法商业使用甲基对硫磷(MP),这在很大程度上影响了市中心居民。作为美国环境保护局(EPA)、有毒物质和疾病登记局(ATSDR)以及州和地方卫生部门多机构应对措施的一部分,我们的实验室开发了一种快速、高通量、选择性的方法,使用同位素稀释高效液相色谱 - 串联质谱法来定量对硝基苯酚(PNP),它是MP暴露的生物标志物。我们测量了从七个不同州的居民那里收集的约16000份样本中的PNP。使用这种方法,我们能够接收来自每个州的样本批次;制备、分析和定量样本中的PNP;验证结果;并在约48小时内将数据报告给卫生部门和ATSDR。这些数据表明,许多居民尿液中的PNP浓度远远超过美国普通人群。事实上,他们尿液中的PNP浓度与职业环境或中毒病例中观察到的更为一致。尽管这些数据与其他MP代谢物数据相结合表明,许多尿液中PNP浓度最高的居民有大量MP暴露,但它们并不能明确排除MP环境降解导致PNP暴露的可能性。即使有其局限性,这些数据在假设所有PNP均源自MP暴露的情况下被使用,这使得美国EPA和ATSDR能够制定一项全面的、以生物学为驱动的应对措施,以保护人类健康,特别是易感人群,并包括临床评估、外展活动、社区教育、综合虫害管理以及家庭去污。