Schillinger Martin, Domanovits Hans, Mlekusch Wolfgang, Bayegan Keywan, Khanakah Gelas, Laggner Anton N, Minar Erich, Stanek Gerold
Division of Angiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, University of Vienna, Medical Faculty, Vienna, Austria.
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2002 Dec 30;114(23-24):972-7.
Chlamydia species are suspected of being involved in the pathogenesis and progression of aortic aneurysms. We investigated serum levels of Chlamydia antibodies in patients with thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAA) and abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) compared to levels in healthy individuals.
We included 35 consecutive patients with TAA, 42 patients with AAA and 42 age- and sex-matched healthy controls in a case control study. Serum antibodies (IgM and IgG) against Chlamydia lipopolysaccharide (LPS), Chlamydia pneumoniae and Chlamydia trachomatis were measured by recombinant ELISA and quantified by measurement of optical density.
Patients with TAA exhibited median immunoglobulin levels against Chlamydia LPS (IgM 0.090, IgG 0.266), C. pneumoniae (IgM 0.023, IgG 0.264) and C. trachomatis (IgG 0.247) comparable to those of healthy subjects [Chlamydia LPS IgM 0.209 (p = 0.1), IgG 0.301 (p = 0.2); C. pneumoniae IgM 0.051 (p = 0.07), IgG 0.516 (p = 0.1); C. trachomatis IgG 0.153 (p = 0.2)]. Patients with AAA had higher serum levels of IgG against Chlamydia LPS (0.560) compared to healthy individuals [0.301 (p = 0.04)], but no significant elevation of antibodies against C. pneumoniae [IgM 0.029 (p = 0.1), IgG 0.545 (p = 0.9)] and C. trachomatis [IgG 0.219 (p = 0.3)].
Thoracic aortic aneurysms were not associated with signs of Chlamydia infection or immunopathogenicity. In contrast, patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms exhibited elevated levels of immunoglobulin against Chlamydia LPS, reflecting an unspecific Chlamydia immunopathogenicity. However, elevated levels of antibodies against distinct Chlamydia species were also not found in AAA patients.
衣原体属被怀疑与主动脉瘤的发病机制和进展有关。我们调查了胸主动脉瘤(TAA)和腹主动脉瘤(AAA)患者血清中衣原体抗体水平,并与健康个体的水平进行比较。
在一项病例对照研究中,我们纳入了35例连续的TAA患者、42例AAA患者以及42例年龄和性别匹配的健康对照者。通过重组酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)检测血清中针对衣原体脂多糖(LPS)、肺炎衣原体和沙眼衣原体的抗体(IgM和IgG),并通过测量光密度进行定量。
TAA患者针对衣原体LPS(IgM 0.090,IgG 0.266)、肺炎衣原体(IgM 0.023,IgG 0.264)和沙眼衣原体(IgG 0.247)的免疫球蛋白水平中位数与健康受试者相当[衣原体LPS IgM 0.209(p = 0.1),IgG 0.301(p = 0.2);肺炎衣原体IgM 0.051(p = 0.07),IgG 0.516(p = 0.1);沙眼衣原体IgG 0.153(p = 0.2)]。与健康个体相比,AAA患者血清中针对衣原体LPS的IgG水平更高(0.560)[0.301(p = 0.04)],但针对肺炎衣原体[IgM 0.029(p = 0.1),IgG 0.545(p = 0.9)]和沙眼衣原体[IgG 0.219(p = 0.3)]的抗体无显著升高。
胸主动脉瘤与衣原体感染或免疫致病性迹象无关。相比之下,腹主动脉瘤患者血清中针对衣原体LPS的免疫球蛋白水平升高,反映出非特异性的衣原体免疫致病性。然而,AAA患者中也未发现针对不同衣原体种类的抗体水平升高。