• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺癌治疗的经济评估:考量患者选择的价值。

Economic evaluation of breast cancer treatment: considering the value of patient choice.

作者信息

Polsky Daniel, Mandelblatt Jeanne S, Weeks Jane C, Venditti Laura, Hwang Yi-Ting, Glick Henry A, Hadley Jack, Schulman Kevin A

机构信息

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6021, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2003 Mar 15;21(6):1139-46. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.126.

DOI:10.1200/JCO.2003.03.126
PMID:12637482
Abstract

PURPOSE

To use 5 years of primary data to compare the incremental cost-effectiveness of breast conservation and radiation versus mastectomy with the restriction of choice to a single therapy versus providing a choice of either therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We evaluated a random retrospective cohort of 2,517 Medicare beneficiaries treated for newly diagnosed stage I or II breast cancer from 1992 through 1994. The outcome measures were quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and 5-year medical costs. Risk and propensity score adjustments were used in the analysis.

RESULTS

A breast conservation and radiation regimen has significantly higher costs than mastectomy in the first year after surgery; the adjusted 5-year costs are $14,054 (95% confidence interval, $9,791 to $18,312) greater than those of mastectomy. The adjusted incremental cost-effectiveness ratio comparing breast conservation and radiation to mastectomy was $219,594 per QALY for the comparison of the two strategies. If the possibility of patient choice from maintaining the availability of multiple treatments versus restricting choice to mastectomy alone provides a quality-of-life gain of 0.031 QALYs, then the cost-effectiveness ratio of this choice option is $80,440 per QALY.

CONCLUSION

The current system of providing a choice between mastectomy and breast conservation surgery is economically attractive when the economic analysis includes the benefit of patient choice of treatment.

摘要

目的

利用5年的原始数据,比较保乳加放疗与乳房切除术的增量成本效益,比较的情况为将选择限制在单一治疗方案与提供两种治疗方案供选择。

患者和方法

我们评估了1992年至1994年期间接受新诊断的I期或II期乳腺癌治疗的2517名医疗保险受益人的随机回顾性队列。结果指标为质量调整生命年(QALY)和5年医疗费用。分析中使用了风险和倾向评分调整。

结果

保乳加放疗方案在术后第一年的成本显著高于乳房切除术;调整后的5年成本比乳房切除术高14,054美元(95%置信区间,9,791美元至18,312美元)。比较保乳加放疗与乳房切除术的调整后的增量成本效益比为每QALY 219,594美元。如果患者从维持多种治疗方案的可用性与仅限制为乳房切除术的选择中获得的生活质量提高为0.031 QALY,那么这种选择方案的成本效益比为每QALY 80,440美元。

结论

当经济分析包括患者选择治疗的益处时,目前在乳房切除术和保乳手术之间提供选择的系统在经济上具有吸引力。

相似文献

1
Economic evaluation of breast cancer treatment: considering the value of patient choice.乳腺癌治疗的经济评估:考量患者选择的价值。
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Mar 15;21(6):1139-46. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.126.
2
Cost-effectiveness of routine radiation therapy following conservative surgery for early-stage breast cancer.早期乳腺癌保乳手术后常规放射治疗的成本效益
J Clin Oncol. 1998 Mar;16(3):1022-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.3.1022.
3
Cost comparison of mastectomy versus breast-conserving therapy for early-stage breast cancer.早期乳腺癌乳房切除术与保乳治疗的成本比较。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001 Mar 21;93(6):447-55. doi: 10.1093/jnci/93.6.447.
4
Cost-Effectiveness of Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer and Age Effect in Older Women.老年女性乳腺癌化疗的成本效益及年龄效应
Value Health. 2015 Dec;18(8):1070-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.08.008. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
5
Decision-analytic model and cost-effectiveness evaluation of postmastectomy radiation therapy in high-risk premenopausal breast cancer patients.高危绝经前乳腺癌患者乳房切除术后放疗的决策分析模型与成本效益评估
J Clin Oncol. 2002 Jun 1;20(11):2713-25. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.07.008.
6
Cost-effectiveness of adding an electron-beam boost to tangential radiation therapy in patients with negative margins after conservative surgery for early-stage breast cancer.
J Clin Oncol. 2000 Jan;18(2):287-95. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.2.287.
7
Cost-effectiveness of full coverage of aromatase inhibitors for Medicare beneficiaries with early breast cancer.医疗保险受益人群早期乳腺癌应用芳香化酶抑制剂全覆盖的成本效益分析。
Cancer. 2013 Jul 1;119(13):2494-502. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28084. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
8
Comparative outcomes and cost-utility following surgical treatment of focal lumbar spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: part 2--estimated lifetime incremental cost-utility ratios.与髋或膝关节骨关节炎相比,手术治疗局限性腰椎椎管狭窄症的比较结果和成本效用:第 2 部分——估计终生增量成本效用比。
Spine J. 2014 Feb 1;14(2):244-54. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.11.011. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
9
Cost-effectiveness of testing for breast cancer susceptibility genes.乳腺癌易感基因检测的成本效益分析。
Value Health. 2009 Mar-Apr;12(2):207-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00418.x. Epub 2008 Jul 18.
10
Cost-effectiveness assessment of lumpectomy cavity boost in elderly women with early stage estrogen receptor positive breast cancer receiving adjuvant radiotherapy.对接受辅助放疗的早期雌激素受体阳性老年乳腺癌女性患者进行乳房肿瘤切除术腔瘤床加量放疗的成本效益评估。
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Apr;119(1):52-6. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.01.026. Epub 2016 Feb 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of current relative value unit-based prices and utility between common surgical procedures, including orthopedic surgeries, in South Korea.韩国常见外科手术(包括骨科手术)当前基于相对价值单位的价格与效用的比较。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2024 Apr 11;22(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12962-024-00538-z.
2
Cost-Effectiveness of MR-Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening of Women With Extremely Dense Breasts After Two Rounds of Screening.两轮筛查后,乳腺磁共振成像在极度致密型乳腺女性乳腺癌筛查中的成本效益分析
Front Oncol. 2021 Sep 9;11:724543. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.724543. eCollection 2021.
3
Cost-Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs. Abbreviated Breast MRI for Screening Women with Intermediate Risk of Breast Cancer-How Low-Cost Must MRI Be?
数字乳腺断层合成术与简化乳腺磁共振成像用于筛查乳腺癌中度风险女性的成本效益——磁共振成像的成本必须多低?
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Mar 12;13(6):1241. doi: 10.3390/cancers13061241.
4
A preliminary prediction model for potentially guiding patient choices between breast conserving surgery and mastectomy in early breast cancer patients; a Dutch experience.早期乳腺癌患者保乳手术与乳房切除术选择的初步预测模型:荷兰经验。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Feb;27(2):545-553. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1740-0. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
5
Paying on the margin for medical care: Evidence from breast cancer treatments.支付医疗护理的保证金:来自乳腺癌治疗的证据。
Am Econ J Econ Policy. 2016 Feb;8(1):52-79. doi: 10.1257/pol.20140293.
6
ESTIMATING TREATMENT EFFECTS ON HEALTHCARE COSTS UNDER EXOGENEITY: IS THERE A 'MAGIC BULLET'?在外生性条件下估计治疗对医疗成本的影响:是否存在“万灵药”?
Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2011 Jul 1;11(1-2):1-26. doi: 10.1007/s10742-011-0072-8.
7
Estimating Decision-Relevant Comparative Effects Using Instrumental Variables.使用工具变量估计决策相关的比较效应。
Stat Biosci. 2011 Sep;3(1):6-27. doi: 10.1007/s12561-011-9033-6.
8
A simulation model approach to analysis of the business case for eliminating health care disparities.一种分析消除医疗保健差异商业案例的仿真模型方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Mar 19;11:31. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-31.
9
Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of cancer patient navigation programs: conceptual and practical issues.评估癌症患者导航计划的成本效益:概念和实践问题。
Cancer. 2009 Dec 1;115(23):5394-403. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24603.
10
Shared decision-making and evidence-based practice.共同决策与循证实践。
Community Ment Health J. 2006 Feb;42(1):87-105. doi: 10.1007/s10597-005-9005-8.