Benedet M J
Universidad Complutense. Facultad de Psicología, Madrid, España.
Rev Neurol. 2003;36(5):457-66.
The issue regarding the relations between behaviour and the brain is no longer the specific goal of neuropsychology, but rather that of the coordinated multidisciplinary activity of all the disciplines that go to make up the neurosciences. The specific contribution of neuropsychology to this multidisciplinary activity consists in trying to determine the nature of cognitive processes so that, in the future, it will be possible to ascertain the anatomophysiological foundations for each of them. The aim of basic research in cognitive neuropsychology is precisely that. The growing interest in research in this discipline that has been observed over the past few years in Spain has not usually been accompanied by the awareness of the fact that conducting research with damaged brains requires (if it is to be valid) a methodology that is specific and different to the methodology used in research with intact brains. In this study we describe some of the main fundamental principles of basic research in cognitive neuropsychology. Through the scientific analysis of a recent piece of research work, we illustrate the consequences of not bearing these principles in mind.
We propose a methodology that can be used to approach basic research in cognitive neuropsychology that allows these undesirable consequences to be avoided. This same methodology constitutes a guide that enables us to evaluate the conclusions of the research, regardless of the statistical processing of the data that support them. Scientific criticism contributes more to the advance of science than actual research does.
行为与大脑之间关系的问题已不再仅仅是神经心理学的特定目标,而是构成神经科学的所有学科协同开展的多学科活动的目标。神经心理学对这一多学科活动的具体贡献在于试图确定认知过程的本质,以便未来能够确定每个认知过程的解剖生理基础。认知神经心理学基础研究的目标正是如此。过去几年在西班牙观察到的对该学科研究兴趣的日益增长,通常并未伴随着这样一种认识,即对受损大脑进行研究(若要使其有效)需要一种特定的、与对完整大脑进行研究所用方法不同的方法。在本研究中,我们描述了认知神经心理学基础研究的一些主要基本原则。通过对近期一项研究工作的科学分析,我们说明了不牢记这些原则的后果。
我们提出一种可用于开展认知神经心理学基础研究的方法,该方法能够避免这些不良后果。同样的方法构成了一个指南,使我们能够评估研究结论,而不论支持这些结论的数据的统计处理情况如何。科学批评对科学进步的贡献比实际研究更大。