Giliarov A M
Dept. of General Ecology, Biological Faculty of Lomonosov, Moscow State University, Moscow, 119899.
Zh Obshch Biol. 2003 Jan-Feb;64(1):3-22.
Although the connection of ecology with evolutionary idea and specifically with Darwinism was proclaimed for a long time it seems that Herbert Spencer's approach with its emphasize on natural equilibrium was much more often used as its real theoretical base. Elements of Darwinian approach appeared only in 1920-30s in works of those few researchers who studying the distribution and population dynamics of different species tried to understand general mechanisms providing their continuing existence. Later, in the middle of 1950s the first attempts were undertaken to consider the population life history (primarily the age specific schedule of death and reproduction) as a result of natural selection aimed to maintain the necessary level of fitness. A special attention in these studies that burgeoned in 1980-90s was paid to looking for various trade-offs between particular parameters of life history, e.g., between the survival of juveniles and fecundity of adults. The problem of life history optimization became central for the whole branch of science named "evolutionary ecology". Though traditionally this branch is connected with Darwinism, it is rooted rather in Spencer's ideas on moving equilibrium and deals more with static than dynamic. Disproportionately less attention was paid to the evolution of communities since these formations could be hardly interpreted as units of Darwinian selection. Moreover, the ecologists dealing with biosphere as a unified biogeochemical system began insist on "nondarwinian" nature of its evolution. The author considers this opinion as not sufficiently grounded. Darwin's ideas about unavoidable exponential growth, intrinsic for any population, consequent deficiency of resources, and differential survival and reproduction of individuals are still useful while studying the evolution of living organisms (phylogenetics) or the development of biosphere as a global ecosystem.
尽管生态学与进化思想,特别是与达尔文主义的联系早已被宣称,但赫伯特·斯宾塞强调自然平衡的方法似乎更常被用作其真正的理论基础。达尔文方法的要素直到20世纪20至30年代才出现在少数研究者的著作中,这些研究者在研究不同物种的分布和种群动态时,试图理解确保它们持续生存的一般机制。后来,在20世纪50年代中期,人们首次尝试将种群生活史(主要是特定年龄的死亡和繁殖时间表)视为自然选择的结果,目的是维持必要的适合度水平。在20世纪80至90年代蓬勃发展的这些研究中,特别关注寻找生活史特定参数之间的各种权衡,例如幼体生存与成体繁殖力之间的权衡。生活史优化问题成为名为“进化生态学”的整个科学分支的核心。尽管传统上这个分支与达尔文主义相关,但它更多地植根于斯宾塞关于动态平衡的思想,并且更多地处理静态而非动态问题。对群落进化的关注相对较少,因为这些群落很难被解释为达尔文选择的单位。此外,将生物圈视为一个统一的生物地球化学系统的生态学家开始坚持其进化具有“非达尔文式”的性质。作者认为这种观点缺乏充分依据。达尔文关于任何种群不可避免的指数增长、随之而来的资源短缺以及个体的差异生存和繁殖的观点,在研究生物体的进化(系统发育学)或作为全球生态系统的生物圈的发展时仍然有用。