Cruickshank John Malcolm
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2002 Sep;16(5):457-70. doi: 10.1023/a:1022146721098.
Type 2 diabetes is becoming very common and is closely linked to physical inactivity and obesity. It is associated with clustering of coronary risk factors and 60-80% of cases have hypertension. The first therapeutic action is appropriate adjustment of life style. Anti-hypertensive therapies such as diuretics, ACE inhibitors and calcium antagonists have been effective in reducing cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes, though calcium antagonists may be less effective than older therapies and ACE-inhibitors in reducing the risk of heart attacks and heart failure (but possibly more effective in stroke reduction). Beta-blockers (BBs) have a poor image as a potential therapy due to apparent adverse effects on surrogate end-points such as insulin-resistance. However large, controlled trials have shown BBs to be highly effective in reducing the risk of cardiovascular events and death in post myocardial infarction patients with diabetes. The UKPDS study in type 2 diabetics with hypertension showed first-line beta-blockade to be at least as effective as ACE-inhibition in preventing all primary macrovascular and microvascular end-points. The active ingredient appears to be beta-1 blockade, acting not only to lower blood pressure but also to prevent sudden death and cardiovascular damage stemming from chronic beta-1 stimulation associated with raised noradrenaline activity. By contrast, in the LIFE study atenolol was less effective than the angiotensin receptor antagonist losartan in reducing cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in mainly elderly hypertensives with diabetes. Thus the best beta-blocker results in reducing hard cardiovascular end-points occur in hypertension studies (including the UKPDS study) involving younger/middle aged (say less than 60-65 years) patients, with relatively high sympathetic activity, relatively compliant/elastic arteries (narrow pulse-pressure) and normally functioning beta-1 receptors. In elderly hypertensive patients beta-blockers may be given as second-line therapy on the back of a low-dose diuretic (but possibly as first line agent in elderly hypertensives with prior myocardial infarction). Thus inappropriate attention to surrogate end-points can lead to faulty prescribing habits. Beta-blockers, currently severely underprescribed, should be considered as a first line therapeutic option for all diabetics with ischaemic heart disease or younger/middle aged diabetics with hypertension (but co-prescribed with low dose diuretic therapy in the elderly). The active ingredient for cardiovascular protection appears to be beta-1 blockade; optimal efficacy in lowering blood pressure and safety e.g. reducing risk of bronchoconstriction, is achieved by choosing an agent with high beta-1 selectivity.
2型糖尿病正变得非常普遍,且与缺乏身体活动和肥胖密切相关。它与冠状动脉危险因素的聚集有关,60%-80%的病例患有高血压。首要的治疗措施是适当调整生活方式。利尿剂、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACE抑制剂)和钙拮抗剂等抗高血压疗法在降低2型糖尿病患者的心血管事件方面已显示出成效,不过在降低心脏病发作和心力衰竭风险方面,钙拮抗剂可能不如传统疗法和ACE抑制剂有效(但在降低中风风险方面可能更有效)。由于对胰岛素抵抗等替代终点有明显不良影响,β受体阻滞剂(BBs)作为一种潜在治疗方法的形象不佳。然而,大型对照试验表明,BBs在降低糖尿病心肌梗死后患者的心血管事件风险和死亡风险方面非常有效。英国前瞻性糖尿病研究(UKPDS)对2型糖尿病合并高血压患者的研究表明,一线使用β受体阻滞剂在预防所有主要大血管和微血管终点方面至少与使用ACE抑制剂一样有效。其活性成分似乎是β1受体阻滞作用,不仅能降低血压,还能预防因去甲肾上腺素活性升高导致的慢性β1受体刺激所引发的猝死和心血管损害。相比之下,在“氯沙坦干预降低高血压患者终点事件研究(LIFE研究)”中,阿替洛尔在降低主要为老年糖尿病高血压患者的心血管事件和全因死亡率方面不如血管紧张素受体拮抗剂氯沙坦有效。因此,在涉及年轻/中年(比如小于60-65岁)患者、交感神经活动相对较高、动脉相对顺应性/弹性较好(脉压窄)且β1受体功能正常的高血压研究(包括UKPDS研究)中,BBs在降低硬性心血管终点方面效果最佳。在老年高血压患者中,BBs可作为低剂量利尿剂后的二线治疗药物(但在有心肌梗死病史的老年高血压患者中可能作为一线药物)。因此,对替代终点的不恰当关注可能导致错误的处方习惯。目前处方严重不足的BBs应被视为所有患有缺血性心脏病的糖尿病患者或年轻/中年糖尿病合并高血压患者的一线治疗选择(但在老年人中与低剂量利尿剂联合使用)。心血管保护的活性成分似乎是β1受体阻滞作用;通过选择具有高β1选择性的药物可实现最佳的降压效果和安全性,例如降低支气管收缩风险。