Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Department of Pharmacy, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Dec;20(12):2724-2732. doi: 10.1111/dom.13451. Epub 2018 Jul 22.
To assess whether nursing home (NH) residents with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) preferentially received "T2D-friendly" (vs "T2D-unfriendly") β-blockers after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and to evaluate the comparative effects of the two groups of β-blockers.
This new-user retrospective cohort study of NH residents with AMI from May 2007 to March 2010 used national data from the Minimum Data Set and Medicare system. T2D-friendly β-blockers were those hypothesized to increase peripheral glucose uptake through vasodilation: carvedilol, nebivolol and labetalol. Primary outcomes were hospitalizations for hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia in the 90 days after AMI. Secondary outcomes were functional decline, death, all-cause re-hospitalization and fracture hospitalization. We compared outcomes using binomial and multinomial logistic regression models after propensity score matching.
Of 2855 NH residents with T2D, 29% initiated a T2D-friendly β-blocker vs 24% of 6098 without T2D (P < 0.001). For primary outcomes among residents with T2D, T2D-friendly vs T2D-unfriendly β-blockers were associated with a reduction in hospitalized hyperglycaemia (odds ratio [OR] 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21-0.97), but unassociated with hypoglycaemia (OR 2.05, 95% CI 0.82-5.10). For secondary outcomes, T2D-friendly β-blockers were associated with a greater rate of re-hospitalization (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.01-1.57), but not death (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.85-1.32), functional decline (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.70-1.19), or fracture (OR 1.69, 95% CI 0.40-7.08).
In older NH residents with T2D, T2D-friendly β-blocker use was associated with a lower rate of hospitalization for hyperglycaemia, but a higher rate of all-cause re-hospitalization.
评估 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者入住养老院后,是否更倾向于使用“对 T2D 友好”(与“对 T2D 不友好”相对)的β受体阻滞剂,以及评估这两类β受体阻滞剂的比较效果。
这是一项 2007 年 5 月至 2010 年 3 月间,采用来自国家最低数据集合和医疗保险系统的全国性养老院居民急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者新用户回顾性队列研究。“对 T2D 友好”的β受体阻滞剂是指那些假设可通过血管舒张增加外周葡萄糖摄取的药物:卡维地洛、比索洛尔和拉贝洛尔。主要结局是 AMI 后 90 天内低血糖和高血糖住院治疗情况。次要结局是功能下降、死亡、全因再住院和骨折住院。我们在进行倾向评分匹配后,使用二项和多项逻辑回归模型比较结局。
在 2855 例患有 T2D 的养老院居民中,29%的患者开始使用“对 T2D 友好”的β受体阻滞剂,而在 6098 例未患有 T2D 的居民中,这一比例为 24%(P<0.001)。对于患有 T2D 的居民的主要结局,与“对 T2D 不友好”的β受体阻滞剂相比,“对 T2D 友好”的β受体阻滞剂与住院高血糖症的减少相关(比值比 [OR] 0.45,95%置信区间 [CI] 0.21-0.97),但与低血糖症无关(OR 2.05,95%CI 0.82-5.10)。对于次要结局,“对 T2D 友好”的β受体阻滞剂与更高的再住院率相关(OR 1.26,95%CI 1.01-1.57),但与死亡率(OR 1.06,95%CI 0.85-1.32)、功能下降(OR 0.91,95%CI 0.70-1.19)或骨折(OR 1.69,95%CI 0.40-7.08)无关。
在患有 T2D 的老年养老院居民中,“对 T2D 友好”的β受体阻滞剂的使用与低血糖症住院率降低相关,但全因再住院率更高。