Brédart Serge, Lampinen James M, Defeldre Anne-Catherine
Cognitive Psychology Unit, University of Liège, Belgium.
Memory. 2003 Jan;11(1):1-11. doi: 10.1080/741938174.
Qualitative characteristics of cryptomnesia, or unintentional plagiarism were investigated. In Experiment 1 we compared accurate and inaccurate source attributions in terms of their level of confidence using instructions that did not require a fixed number of responses. Confidence was lower for plagiarised responses than for correct responses. Nevertheless, participants provided high ratings of certainty for a large proportion of their plagiarised responses. In Experiment 2 the phenomenological differences between plagiarised recall and veridical recall were compared by using an adaptation of the memory characteristics questionnaire (Johnson, Foley, Suengas, & Raye, 1988). Correct responses were associated with more experiential detail than plagiarised responses. However, a considerable number of plagiarised responses were accompanied by a confident memory of at least one qualitative characteristic. Results are discussed in terms of the source monitoring framework developed by Johnson, Hashtroudi, and Lindsay (1993).
对潜隐记忆或无意抄袭的质性特征进行了研究。在实验1中，我们使用不要求固定回答数量的指示语，根据信心水平比较了准确和不准确的来源归因。抄袭回答的信心低于正确回答。然而，参与者对很大一部分抄袭回答给出了高度确定性的评分。在实验2中，通过对记忆特征问卷（约翰逊、福利、苏恩加斯和雷伊，1988年）进行改编，比较了抄袭回忆和真实回忆之间的现象学差异。正确回答比抄袭回答与更多的经验细节相关联。然而，相当数量的抄袭回答伴随着对至少一个质性特征的自信记忆。根据约翰逊、哈什特鲁迪和林赛（1993年）提出的来源监测框架对结果进行了讨论。
