Volumetric considerations in radiotherapy for pediatric parameningeal rhabdomyosarcomas.

PURPOSE

To assess the influence of radiation volume on outcome in pediatric parameningeal rhabdomyosarcomas (PM-RMSs).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty patients ranging in age from 2 to 18 years (median 6) with PM-RMS were treated at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania and the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia between August 1988 and December 1999. The histologic subtypes included embryonal (n = 26), alveolar (n = 3), and undifferentiated (n = 1). Twenty-seven patients had Group III and three had Group IV disease. Twenty-seven patients underwent biopsy only and three subtotal resection. All patients were treated with multiple-agent chemotherapy and external beam radiotherapy. In 8 patients, all of whom had intracranial tumor extension, the tumor and whole brain were treated as the initial volume. In the remaining patients, most of those treated before 1992 were treated to the prechemotherapy (CMT) tumor volume for the entire treatment up to the total dose, which ranged from 45 to 59.4 Gy (median dose 57.9). In contrast, patients treated after 1992 generally received radiation initially to the pre-CMT volume (30.6-40 Gy; median dose 36) followed by a conedown to the post-CMT volume to a final dose of 41.4-55.2 Gy (median 50.4).

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 6.2 years (range 2.1-13.3), the actuarial 5-year overall survival, progression-free survival, and local control rate for the entire group was 82%, 76%, and 76%, respectively. Seven failures and five deaths have been documented. In univariate analysis, histologic type, tumor size, and age at diagnosis were found to be predictive of overall survival and local control. No statistically significant difference in overall survival or local control was seen between patients who received a conedown to the post-CMT volume (n = 13) and patients in whom the pre-CMT volume was included for the entire treatment (n = 9).

CONCLUSION

Radiotherapy delivered to children with PM-RMS using a shrinking field technique with a post-CMT volume boost was effective and appears to give results comparable to those of patients in whom the pre-CMT volume was treated for the entire course. The use of such tailored treatment fields is likely to lead to fewer late effects and warrants further investigation.