Suppr超能文献

偏头痛诊断标准的结构表征:专家观点

A structural representation of migraine diagnostic criteria: the experts' view.

作者信息

Nash Jane Gradwohl, Nash Justin M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Stonehill College, Easton, MA 02357, USA.

出版信息

Headache. 2003 Apr;43(4):322-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2003.03066.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To generate an empirically derived structural representation of migraine diagnostic criteria in a group of international headache experts using the Pathfinder network scaling algorithm in order to evaluate the validity of the migraine criteria used in the International Headache Society (IHS) classification system.

BACKGROUND

Because it is a disease entity that lacks objective defining markers, developing valid diagnostic criteria for migraine is a challenge. The IHS committee relied on expert consensus to develop their classification system in 1988. Expert consensus also was used to evaluate the validity of the IHS classification system, but further studies employing alternative methods still are needed.

METHODS

Headache experts representing the Executive Committee of the IHS and the Board of Directors of the American Headache Society analyzed 14 criteria (7 IHS and 7 non-IHS) considered relevant in diagnosing migraine. Their ratings were submitted to the Pathfinder algorithm to generate a network structure reflecting the experts' conceptualization of migraine diagnostic criteria.

RESULTS

The expert network had 3 groupings: headache characteristics (eg, phonophobia, unilateral pain, throbbing pain), biological contributing factors (eg, family history, hormonal relationship, relief with sleep), and triggering factors (eg, worse with stress, food triggers). The IHS criteria were clustered together in the center portion of the network. A t test showed that each IHS criterion was closer conceptually to other IHS criteria than to non-IHS criteria. Graph theory indices revealed that the most central criteria were unilateral pain, moderate/severe intensity, and nausea/vomiting.

CONCLUSION

The structural representation of migraine diagnostic criteria from these international headache experts is consistent with the migraine diagnostic criteria set forth in the IHS classification system and thus provides further support for the validity of migraine criteria in the IHS system.

摘要

目的

运用探路者网络标度算法,在一组国际头痛专家中生成基于经验的偏头痛诊断标准结构表征,以评估国际头痛协会(IHS)分类系统中偏头痛标准的有效性。

背景

由于偏头痛是一种缺乏客观定义标志物的疾病实体,因此制定有效的偏头痛诊断标准具有挑战性。IHS委员会在1988年依靠专家共识制定了其分类系统。专家共识也被用于评估IHS分类系统的有效性,但仍需要采用其他方法进行进一步研究。

方法

代表IHS执行委员会和美国头痛协会董事会的头痛专家分析了14条被认为与偏头痛诊断相关的标准(7条IHS标准和7条非IHS标准)。他们的评分被提交给探路者算法,以生成反映专家对偏头痛诊断标准概念化的网络结构。

结果

专家网络有3个分组:头痛特征(如恐声症、单侧疼痛、搏动性疼痛)、生物学促成因素(如家族史、激素关系、睡眠缓解)和触发因素(如压力加重、食物触发)。IHS标准聚集在网络的中心部分。t检验表明,每个IHS标准在概念上与其他IHS标准比与非IHS标准更接近。图论指标显示,最核心的标准是单侧疼痛、中度/重度强度和恶心/呕吐。

结论

这些国际头痛专家对偏头痛诊断标准的结构表征与IHS分类系统中提出的偏头痛诊断标准一致,从而为IHS系统中偏头痛标准的有效性提供了进一步支持。

相似文献

1
A structural representation of migraine diagnostic criteria: the experts' view.
Headache. 2003 Apr;43(4):322-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2003.03066.x.
2
Use of cluster analysis to validate IHS diagnostic criteria for migraine and tension-type headache.
Headache. 1999 Mar;39(3):181-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.1999.3903181.x.
3
The IHS classification criteria for migraine headaches in adolescents need minor modifications.
Headache. 1996 Jun;36(6):362-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.1996.3606362.x.
4
American Headache Society members' assessment of headache diagnostic criteria.
Headache. 2003 Jan;43(1):2-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2003.03002.x.
7
Pediatric migraine and the International Headache Society (IHS) criteria.
Neurology. 1997 Mar;48(3):602-7. doi: 10.1212/wnl.48.3.602.
10
Validation of the classification of migraine without aura (IHS A1.1) proposed in ICHD-2.
Headache. 2005 Nov-Dec;45(10):1339-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2005.00266.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验