Vassiliadis John, Edwards Robert, Larcos George, Hitos Kerry
Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Emerg Med (Fremantle). 2003 Feb;15(1):42-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-2026.2003.00407.x.
To describe the establishment of a service to provide bedside focused assessment sonography in trauma and to evaluate the service to date.
Emergency department of an urban trauma centre.
A prospective study of trauma patients who received a focused assessment sonography in trauma examination performed by a clinician managing the trauma in the emergency department. Accuracy was determined by comparing the scan interpretation with abdomino-pelvic computerized tomography, laparotomy or postmortem examination.
The study period ran from 1 January 2000 to 11 September 2001 inclusive (20 months). One hundred and forty patients were included, with a final diagnosis established by computerized tomography (n = 124) and/or laparotomy (n = 18). There were 26 true-positives, 101 true-negatives, two false-positives and 11 false-negatives. Ten of the false-negative studies were performed by clinicians who had not reached accreditation. The sensitivity of focused assessment sonography in trauma was 70%, specificity 98% and diagnostic accuracy 91%.
We have described the implementation of a clinician-based focused assessment sonography in trauma service within the emergency department with the support of radiology/ultrasound and trauma service. Processes for credentialling, quality assurance and training need to be in place. Significant issues exist with the length of time it takes clinicians to reach accreditation, in order that a critical mass of clinicians exists to provide a consistent service. The credentialling process should mandate a minimum number of supervised examinations.
描述在创伤中提供床旁重点评估超声检查服务的建立过程,并对该服务进行至今的评估。
城市创伤中心急诊科。
对在急诊科处理创伤的临床医生进行创伤重点评估超声检查的创伤患者进行前瞻性研究。通过将扫描解读结果与腹部盆腔计算机断层扫描、剖腹手术或尸检结果进行比较来确定准确性。
研究期间为2000年1月1日至2001年9月11日(共20个月)。纳入140例患者,最终诊断通过计算机断层扫描(n = 124)和/或剖腹手术(n = 18)确定。有26例假阳性、101例假阴性、2例假阳性和11例假阴性。10例假阴性检查是由未获得认证的临床医生进行的。创伤重点评估超声检查的敏感性为70%,特异性为98%,诊断准确性为91%。
我们描述了在放射科/超声科和创伤服务部门的支持下,在急诊科实施基于临床医生的创伤重点评估超声检查服务的情况。需要建立认证、质量保证和培训流程。临床医生获得认证所需的时间存在重大问题,以便有足够数量的临床医生提供一致的服务。认证过程应规定最少数量的监督检查。