Allen P F, McMillan A S
Department of Restorative Dentistry, University Dental School and Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003 Apr;14(2):173-9. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140206.x.
A longitudinal clinical trial involving 103 subjects was undertaken to assess the impact of oral implant therapy on the psychosocial well-being of subjects with complete denture wearing problems. There were four experimental groups: (1) an implant group, where subjects were edentulous/edentate in one jaw and requested and received implants to retain an oral prosthesis (IG); (2) subjects edentulous/edentate in one jaw requesting implants but who received conventional dentures (CDG1); (3) edentulous subjects requesting replacement of their dentures by conventional means (CDG2); (4) dentate subjects requiring routine treatment, who were included for comparison. Data were collected in each group pre- and post-treatment using validated oral specific [the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP)], and generic (the SF36) health status measures. Subjects in IG, CDG1 and CDG2 also completed a denture satisfaction scale. IG and CDG1 subjects reported that tooth loss and denture wearing problems had a much greater impact on their quality of life than subjects seeking conventional dentures. Dentate subjects had a much better oral health status compared with denture-wearing subjects. Following treatment, subjects who received implant-retained prostheses (IG) reported a significant improvement in satisfaction and health-related quality of life, as did subjects who requested and received conventional dentures (CDG2). Subjects who requested implants, but received conventional dentures (CDG1), reported little improvement in denture satisfaction and only modest improvement in their quality of life. None of the denture-wearing subjects reported health-related quality of life that was as good as that of dentate subjects. The findings have significant implications in the assessment of outcomes in future clinical trials.
一项涉及103名受试者的纵向临床试验开展,以评估口腔种植治疗对有全口义齿佩戴问题受试者心理社会幸福感的影响。有四个实验组:(1)种植组,受试者一侧颌骨无牙/缺牙,要求并接受种植体以保留口腔修复体(IG);(2)一侧颌骨无牙/缺牙的受试者要求种植但接受传统义齿(CDG1);(3)无牙受试者要求用传统方法更换义齿(CDG2);(4)需要常规治疗的有牙受试者,纳入作为对照。在治疗前和治疗后,使用经过验证的口腔特定[口腔健康影响量表(OHIP)]和通用(SF36)健康状况测量方法收集每组的数据。IG、CDG1和CDG2组的受试者还完成了义齿满意度量表。IG和CDG1组的受试者报告称,牙齿缺失和义齿佩戴问题对他们生活质量的影响比寻求传统义齿的受试者大得多。有牙受试者的口腔健康状况比佩戴义齿的受试者好得多。治疗后,接受种植体支持修复体(IG)的受试者报告满意度和与健康相关的生活质量有显著改善,要求并接受传统义齿(CDG2)的受试者也是如此。要求种植但接受传统义齿(CDG1)的受试者报告义齿满意度改善不大,生活质量仅略有改善。没有佩戴义齿的受试者报告与健康相关的生活质量能与有牙受试者一样好。这些发现对未来临床试验结果的评估具有重要意义。