Tomak Patrick R, Cloft Harry J, Kaga Akihiko, Cawley C Michael, Dion Jacques, Barrow Daniel L
Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Neurosurgery. 2003 Apr;52(4):750-60; discussion 760-2. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000053221.22954.85.
Tentorial dural arteriovenous malformations (DAVMs) are uncommon lesions associated with an aggressive natural history. Controversy exists regarding their optimal treatment. We present a single-institution series of tentorial DAVMs treated during a 12-year period, address the current controversies, and present the rationale for our current therapeutic strategy.
Twenty-two patients with tentorial DAVMs were treated between 1988 and 2000. Treatment consisted of transarterial or transvenous embolization, surgical resection, disconnection of venous drainage, or a combination of these therapies. The clinical presentations, radiological features, treatment strategies, and results were studied.
Eighteen patients (82%) presented with intracranial hemorrhage or progressive neurological deficits. Retrograde leptomeningeal venous drainage was documented in 22 cases (100%), classifying the lesions as Borden Type III. Angiographic follow-up monitoring was performed for 0 to 120 months and clinical follow-up monitoring for 1 to 120 months. Posttreatment angiography demonstrated obliteration in 22 cases (100%). Two patients experienced neurological decline after endovascular treatment and died. All of the 20 surviving patients exhibited clinical improvement; there were no episodes of rehemorrhage or new neurological deficits. Outcomes were excellent in 17 cases (77%), good in 2 cases (9%), and fair in 1 case (5%), and there were 2 deaths (9%).
Tentorial DAVMs are aggressive lesions that require prompt total angiographic obliteration. Disconnection of the venous drainage from the fistula may be accomplished with transarterial embolization to the venous side, transvenous embolization, or surgical disconnection of the fistula. We think that extensive nidal resections carry more risk and are unnecessary. We do not think there is a role for stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of these lesions.
小脑幕硬脑膜动静脉畸形(DAVMs)是一种罕见的病变,其自然病程具有侵袭性。关于其最佳治疗方法存在争议。我们呈现了在12年期间于单一机构治疗的小脑幕DAVMs系列病例,探讨当前的争议,并阐述我们当前治疗策略的依据。
1988年至2000年间,对22例小脑幕DAVMs患者进行了治疗。治疗方法包括经动脉或经静脉栓塞、手术切除、静脉引流阻断或这些治疗方法的联合应用。对临床表现、放射学特征、治疗策略及结果进行了研究。
18例患者(82%)表现为颅内出血或进行性神经功能缺损。22例(100%)记录到逆行性软脑膜静脉引流,将病变分类为Borden III型。血管造影随访监测时间为0至120个月,临床随访监测时间为1至120个月。治疗后血管造影显示22例(100%)病变闭塞。2例患者在血管内治疗后出现神经功能恶化并死亡。20例存活患者均表现出临床改善;未发生再出血或新的神经功能缺损事件。17例(77%)患者预后极佳,2例(9%)良好,1例(5%)一般,2例死亡(9%)。
小脑幕DAVMs是具有侵袭性的病变,需要迅速实现血管造影完全闭塞。可通过经动脉向静脉侧栓塞、经静脉栓塞或手术切断瘘管来实现瘘管静脉引流的阻断。我们认为广泛的瘤巢切除风险更大且无必要。我们认为立体定向放射外科在这些病变的治疗中无作用。