Weatherly Jeffrey N, Arthur Emily I L, Tischart Lindsey M
Department of Psychology, University of North Dakota, ND 58202-8380, Grand Forks, USA.
Anim Cogn. 2003 Mar;6(1):17-26. doi: 10.1007/s10071-003-0160-4. Epub 2003 Feb 25.
Previous research has demonstrated that rats will increase their rates of lever pressing for sucrose rewards in the first half of an experimental session when food pellets, rather than the same sucrose, continually serve as the reward in the second half of the session. This effect has been coined induction, and the present study investigated whether it could be altered by altering "motivational" variables. Experiment 1 manipulated subjects' motivation by altering, across conditions, their level of food deprivation. Predictably, the size of induction varied directly with level of deprivation. Experiments 2 and 3 manipulated subjects' motivation by feeding them food pellets and sucrose, respectively, prior to their responding in the experimental session. These pre-session feedings decreased the size of the observed induction in both experiments. The results from the present study indicate that the size of induction is correlated with subjects' motivation to respond for the available reinforcers. They are also consistent with the idea that operant processes underlie the effect. The notion that induction might encompass the concept of "anticipation" is also discussed.
先前的研究表明,在实验环节的前半段,当大鼠按压杠杆获取蔗糖奖励时,如果在该环节的后半段持续用食物颗粒而非相同的蔗糖作为奖励,大鼠按压杠杆获取蔗糖奖励的速率会提高。这种效应被称为诱导,本研究调查了它是否可以通过改变“动机”变量来改变。实验1通过在不同条件下改变大鼠的食物剥夺水平来操纵其动机。不出所料,诱导的大小与剥夺水平直接相关。实验2和实验3分别通过在大鼠进行实验环节反应之前给它们喂食食物颗粒和蔗糖来操纵其动机。这两种实验前喂食都减小了两个实验中观察到的诱导大小。本研究的结果表明,诱导的大小与大鼠为可获得的强化物做出反应的动机相关。这些结果也与操作性过程是该效应的基础这一观点一致。文中还讨论了诱导可能包含“预期”概念的观点。