Chang Kwang-Poo, Reed Steven G, McGwire Bradford S, Soong Lynn
Department of Microbiology/Immunology, University of Health Sciences/Chicago Medical School, 3333 Green Bay Road, North Chicago, IL 60064, USA.
Acta Trop. 2003 Mar;85(3):375-90. doi: 10.1016/s0001-706x(02)00238-3.
Leishmanial mechanisms of virulence have been proposed previously to involve two different groups of parasite molecules. One group consists of largely surface and secretory products, and the second group includes intracellular molecules, referred to as 'pathoantigens'. In the first group are invasive/evasive determinants, which protect not only parasites themselves, but also infected host cells from premature cytolysis. These determinants help intracellular amastigotes maintain continuous infection by growing at a slow rate in the parasitophorous vacuoles of host macrophages. This is illustrated in closed in vitro systems, e.g. Leishmania amazonensis in macrophage cell lines. Although individual macrophages may become heavily parasitized at times, massive destruction of macrophages has not been observed to result from uncontrolled parasite replication. This is thus unlikely to be the direct cause of virulence manifested as the clinical symptoms seen in human leishmaniasis. Of relevance is likely the second group of immunopathology-causing parasite 'pathoantigens'. These are highly conserved cytoplasmic proteins, which have been found to contain Leishmania-unique epitopes immunologically active in leishmaniasis. How these intracellular parasite antigens become exposed to the host immune system is accounted for by periodic cytolysis of the parasites during natural infection. This event is notable with a small number of parasites, even as they grow in an infected culture. The cytolysis of these parasites to release 'pathoantigens' may be inadvertent or medicated by specific mechanisms. Information on the pathoantigenic epitopes is limited. T-cell epitopes have long been recognized, albeit ill-defined, as important in eliciting CD4+ cell development along either the Th1 or Th2 pathway. Their operational mechanisms in suppressing or exacerbating cutaneous disease are still under intensive investigation. However, immune response to B-cell epitopes of such 'pathoantigens' is clearly futile and counterproductive. Their intracellular location within the parasites renders them inaccessible to the specific antibodies generated. One example is the Leishmania K39 epitope, against which antibodies are produced in exceedingly high titers, especially in Indian kala-azar. Here, we consider the hypothetical emergence of this pathoantigenicity and its potential contributions to the virulent phenotype in the form of immunopathology. Microbial virulence may be similarly explained in other emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases. Attenuation of microbial virulence may be achieved by genetic elimination of pathoantigenicity, thereby providing mutants potentially useful as avirulent live vaccines for immunoprophylasis of infectious diseases.
先前有人提出利什曼原虫的致病机制涉及两类不同的寄生虫分子。一类主要由表面产物和分泌产物组成,另一类包括细胞内分子,即“致病抗原”。第一类包括侵袭/逃避决定簇,它们不仅保护寄生虫自身,还保护受感染的宿主细胞免于过早的细胞溶解。这些决定簇通过在宿主巨噬细胞的吞噬泡中缓慢生长,帮助细胞内无鞭毛体维持持续感染。这在封闭的体外系统中得到了证实,例如巨噬细胞系中的亚马逊利什曼原虫。尽管有时单个巨噬细胞可能会被大量寄生,但尚未观察到由于寄生虫不受控制的复制导致巨噬细胞大量破坏。因此,这不太可能是导致人类利什曼病临床症状的毒力的直接原因。可能相关的是第二类引起免疫病理的寄生虫“致病抗原”。这些是高度保守的细胞质蛋白,已发现它们含有在利什曼病中具有免疫活性的利什曼原虫独特表位。在自然感染期间,寄生虫的周期性细胞溶解解释了这些细胞内寄生虫抗原如何暴露于宿主免疫系统。即使在感染培养物中生长时,少数寄生虫也会出现这种情况。这些寄生虫的细胞溶解以释放“致病抗原”可能是偶然的,也可能是由特定机制介导的。关于致病抗原表位的信息有限。长期以来,人们一直认为T细胞表位在引发CD4 +细胞沿Th1或Th2途径发育方面很重要,尽管其定义不明确。它们在抑制或加重皮肤病方面的作用机制仍在深入研究中。然而,对这种“致病抗原”的B细胞表位的免疫反应显然是无效的,而且适得其反。它们在寄生虫细胞内的位置使得它们无法被产生的特异性抗体识别。一个例子是利什曼原虫K39表位,针对该表位会产生极高滴度的抗体,特别是在印度黑热病中。在这里,我们考虑这种致病抗原性的假设出现及其以免疫病理形式对毒力表型的潜在贡献。在其他新出现和重新出现的传染病中,微生物毒力可能也有类似的解释。通过基因消除致病抗原性可以实现微生物毒力的减弱,从而提供可能用作无毒活疫苗用于传染病免疫预防的突变体。