Myhrer Trond
Division for Protection and Material, Norwegian Defence Research Establishment, PO Box 25, NO-2027 Kjeller, Norway.
Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2003 Mar;41(2-3):268-87. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0173(02)00268-0.
From previous literature, it appears that most classical neurotransmitter systems can in some way influence learning and memory in the rat. A matter of crucial interest is, however, whether the chemical systems contribute in a similar manner or whether they have different abilities to support cognitive processes. The purpose of the present study was to investigate this issue. The investigation was carried out by reviewing relevant studies of neurochemistry and cognition. Inclusion criteria were set for selection of behavioral tasks to be elucidated and for studies employing acceptable tasks. Morris water maze, radial maze, passive avoidance, and spontaneous alternation met the criteria for inclusion, and a table for each of these tests summarizes the neurochemical results of the studies accepted for inclusion. In this way, a reliable comparability of results from relevant studies was obtained. The comparisons revealed that for both systemic and targeted infusions of agents the neurochemical systems possess different abilities to influence learning and memory. Calculation of impact factors (percentage of significant effects of chemical agents like agonists, antagonists, neurotoxins) showed that glutamate was ranking highest (93), followed by GABA (81), dopamine (81), acetylcholine (81), serotonin (55), and norepinephrine (48). No task specific roles were observed for the transmitter systems. The highest sensitivity (percentage of significant effects) to interference with neurochemical systems was found for the spontaneous alternation task (86), followed by water maze (76), passive avoidance (72), and radial maze (58). The multiple memory systems in the rat brain can hardly be related to specific transmitter systems, because of the great extent of interactions between the systems.
从以往的文献来看,大多数经典神经递质系统似乎都能以某种方式影响大鼠的学习和记忆。然而,一个至关重要的问题是,这些化学系统是以类似的方式发挥作用,还是它们支持认知过程的能力有所不同。本研究的目的就是调查这个问题。研究通过回顾神经化学与认知方面的相关研究来进行。为选择要阐释的行为任务以及采用可接受任务的研究设定了纳入标准。莫里斯水迷宫、放射状迷宫、被动回避和自发交替符合纳入标准,针对这些测试中的每一项都有一个表格总结了被纳入研究的神经化学结果。通过这种方式,实现了相关研究结果的可靠可比性。比较结果显示,无论是全身给药还是靶向给药,神经化学系统影响学习和记忆的能力都不同。计算影响因子(激动剂、拮抗剂、神经毒素等化学物质产生显著效应的百分比)表明,谷氨酸排名最高(93),其次是γ-氨基丁酸(81)、多巴胺(81)、乙酰胆碱(81)、5-羟色胺(55)和去甲肾上腺素(48)。未观察到递质系统有特定的任务作用。自发交替任务对神经化学系统干扰的敏感度最高(显著效应的百分比),为86%,其次是水迷宫(76%)、被动回避(72%)和放射状迷宫(58%)。由于大鼠大脑中的多个记忆系统之间存在广泛的相互作用,它们很难与特定的递质系统相关联。