Jonkers R E, Boersma W G
Academisch Medisch Centrum/Universiteit van Amsterdam, afd. Longziekten, Postbus 22.660, 1100 DD Amsterdam.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2003 Mar 8;147(10):437-41.
Pneumococcal pneumonia and bacteraemia are an important cause of morbidity and mortality, especially in a number of risk groups. On the basis of data from available literature, there is no convincing evidence that vaccination of such risk groups, including all people over 65, with a polyvalent vaccine of pneumococcal capsular polysaccharides in addition to influenza vaccination offers any additional protection against the risk of acquiring pneumococcal pneumonia. There is adequate evidence that pneumococcal vaccination does protect against invasive infections and that in this respect vaccination of all elderly persons could be cost-effective. However, there are insufficient data on whether pneumococcal vaccination provides additional protection against invasive infections in people already receiving influenza vaccination. Therefore a well-considered assessment of the cost-effectiveness of applying such a strategy in the Netherlands is not yet possible. Vaccination of (imminent) immuno-compromised persons is only effective and of value if an adequate antibody response can be expected. There is as yet no proven advantage of vaccination with a conjugate vaccine in adults.
肺炎球菌肺炎和菌血症是发病和死亡的重要原因,尤其是在一些风险群体中。根据现有文献数据,没有令人信服的证据表明,对包括所有65岁以上人群在内的此类风险群体接种肺炎球菌荚膜多糖多价疫苗以及流感疫苗,能提供任何额外保护以预防罹患肺炎球菌肺炎的风险。有充分证据表明,肺炎球菌疫苗确实能预防侵袭性感染,在这方面对所有老年人进行疫苗接种可能具有成本效益。然而,关于肺炎球菌疫苗接种是否能为已经接种流感疫苗的人群提供额外的侵袭性感染防护,数据不足。因此,尚未能对在荷兰应用这种策略的成本效益进行深思熟虑的评估。(即将)免疫功能低下者只有在预期能产生足够抗体反应时,接种疫苗才有效且有价值。目前尚无证据证明成人接种结合疫苗有优势。