Hamberger Marla J, Seidel William T
Department of Neurology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2003 Mar;9(3):479-89. doi: 10.1017/s135561770393013x.
Naming is typically assessed with visual naming tasks, yet, some patients with genuine word-finding difficulty (evident in auditorily based discourse) show minimal difficulty on such measures. Evidence from cortical mapping, brain imaging and neuropsychological studies suggests that auditory naming measures might provide more relevant or at least, complementary information. We developed comparable auditory and visual naming tests and present normative data for accuracy, response time, and tip-of-the-tongue responses based on 100 controls. Test validity was supported by findings that left temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) patients (i.e., a population with expected naming difficulty) performed more poorly on auditory but not visual naming compared to right TLE patients (i.e., a population without expected naming difficulty). Internal and test-retest reliability coefficients were reasonable. Finally, test utility was assessed on an individual basis, and auditory but not visual naming performance predicted impairment.
命名通常通过视觉命名任务进行评估,然而,一些存在真正找词困难(在基于听觉的话语中明显)的患者在这些测量中显示出极小的困难。来自皮质映射、脑成像和神经心理学研究的证据表明,听觉命名测量可能提供更相关或至少是补充性的信息。我们开发了可比的听觉和视觉命名测试,并基于100名对照者给出了关于准确性、反应时间和舌尖反应的常模数据。左颞叶癫痫(TLE)患者(即预期存在命名困难的人群)与右TLE患者(即无预期命名困难的人群)相比,在听觉而非视觉命名上表现更差,这一发现支持了测试的有效性。内部和重测信度系数是合理的。最后,对个体进行了测试效用评估,听觉而非视觉命名表现预测了损伤。