Suppr超能文献

保护性耕作流域地表径流中的阿特拉津、去乙基阿特拉津和去异丙基阿特拉津。

Atrazine, deethylatrazine, and deisopropylatrazine in surface runoff from conservation tilled watersheds.

作者信息

Shipitalo Martin J, Owens Lloyd B

机构信息

USDA-Agricultural Research Service, North Appalachian Experimental Watershed, P.O. Box 488, Coshocton, Ohio 43812-0488, USA.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2003 Mar 1;37(5):944-50. doi: 10.1021/es020870b.

Abstract

Atrazine and two of its metabolites, deethylatrazine (DEA) and deisopropylatrazine (DIA), are frequently detected in surface runoff. Although their health and environmental effects may be similar to that of atrazine and ratios of their concentrations are useful in delineating sources of contamination, there have been few long-term studies of the factors affecting their losses in runoff. Therefore, losses of atrazine, DEA, and DIA were monitored for six years in runoff from seven small (0.45-0.79 ha) watersheds under three tillage practices. Weather year and the timing of runoff-producing rainfall had a greater effect on atrazine, DEA, and DIA concentrations and losses than did tillage practice. DEA was the most frequently detected metabolite with an average concentration in the year of atrazine application, of 2.5 microg L(-1) compared to 0.7 microg L(-1) for DIA. Atrazine exceeded its 3 /g L(-1) maximum contaminant level (MCL) up to 100 days after application. DEA and DIA exceeded the atrazine MCL up to 50 days after atrazine application; thus, failure to monitor their presence may result in underestimation of the environmental impact of atrazine usage. The molar concentration ratio of DEA to atrazine (DAR) was affected by tillage treatment, weather year, and possibly soil type. These factors may need to be taken into account when DAR is used as an index of atrazine movement. The ratio of DIA to DEA (D2R) was fairly constant and should be useful in determining the parent compounds contributing DIA to surface waters.

摘要

莠去津及其两种代谢物,脱乙基莠去津(DEA)和脱异丙基莠去津(DIA),经常在地表径流中被检测到。尽管它们对健康和环境的影响可能与莠去津相似,且它们浓度的比值有助于确定污染源,但关于影响其径流损失的因素的长期研究却很少。因此,在三种耕作方式下,对七个小流域(0.45 - 0.79公顷)的径流中莠去津、DEA和DIA的损失进行了六年的监测。气象年份和产生径流降雨的时间对莠去津、DEA和DIA的浓度及损失的影响比耕作方式更大。DEA是最常被检测到的代谢物,在施用莠去津的年份里,其平均浓度为2.5微克/升,而DIA为0.7微克/升。莠去津在施用后长达100天内超过了其3微克/升的最大污染物水平(MCL)。DEA和DIA在莠去津施用后长达50天内超过了莠去津的MCL;因此,未能监测它们的存在可能导致对莠去津使用的环境影响估计不足。DEA与莠去津的摩尔浓度比(DAR)受耕作处理、气象年份以及可能的土壤类型影响。当将DAR用作莠去津迁移指标时,可能需要考虑这些因素。DIA与DEA的比值(D2R)相当恒定,在确定向地表水贡献DIA的母体化合物时应会很有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验