Umeki Hidenori, Yamaguchi Yumiko, Tsugata Mikiko, Wakana Kimio, Somekawa Yoshiaki, Shimabukuro Kouji, Ohara Motohiro, Terauchi Tomoko, Ichimura Mikio, Otsuka Isao, Aso Takeshi
Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Toride Kyodo Hospital.
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2003 Mar;30(3):377-82.
The aim of the present study was to examine the usefulness of neoadjuvant intraarterial chemotherapy (NAC) using nedaplatin as key drug to improve the prognosis in case of advanced cervical cancer. Twenty-five cases of advanced cervical cancer (15 cases of stage II with high risks, 10 of stage III, referred to as the 254-S group) treated by NAC using nedaplatin, mitomycin C and peplomycin were compared with 30 cases (22 cases of stage II with high risks, 8 of stage III, referred to as the CDDP group) treated using cisplatin and mitomycin C which is the conventional regimen, in terms of measurable response, pathological response, rate of lymph node metastasis, cumulative survival rate, side effects and relapse style. According to the evaluation by measurable responses, the response rate was 90% (CR 52%) in the 254-S group and 75% (CR 15%) in the CDDP group. For pathological response of the specimen, the CR rate was 16% in the 254-S group and 23% in the CDDP group. The rate of lymph node metastasis extracted surgically was 33% and 41%, respectively. The cumulative survival rate in the 254-S group was about 10% better than in the CDDP group, but no significant difference was found. Leucopenia of both groups was of the same grade. In the 254-S group, although thrombocytopenia was more critical than in the CDDP group, there was a slight tendency to kidney toxicity. The locoregional recurrence rate was 12% in the 254-S group and 30% in the CDDP group. The distant metastasis rate was 16% and 27%, respectively. Although neoadjuvant intraarterial chemotherapy using nedaplatin as a key drug was useful to improve the prognosis of advanced cervical cancer, measures against recurrence outside the pelvis and individualization of medical treatment were considered to lead to a further improvement of the prognosis.
本研究的目的是探讨以奈达铂为关键药物的新辅助动脉内化疗(NAC)对改善晚期宫颈癌预后的有效性。将25例采用奈达铂、丝裂霉素C和培普利欧霉素进行NAC治疗的晚期宫颈癌患者(15例高危II期、10例III期,称为254 - S组)与30例采用顺铂和丝裂霉素C传统方案治疗的患者(22例高危II期、8例III期,称为顺铂组)在可测量反应、病理反应、淋巴结转移率、累积生存率、副作用及复发方式等方面进行比较。根据可测量反应评估,254 - S组的反应率为90%(完全缓解率52%),顺铂组为75%(完全缓解率15%)。对于标本的病理反应,254 - S组的完全缓解率为16%,顺铂组为23%。手术切除的淋巴结转移率分别为33%和41%。254 - S组的累积生存率比顺铂组约高10%,但未发现显著差异。两组的白细胞减少程度相同。在254 - S组,虽然血小板减少比顺铂组更严重,但有轻微的肾毒性倾向。254 - S组的局部区域复发率为12%,顺铂组为30%。远处转移率分别为16%和27%。尽管以奈达铂为关键药物的新辅助动脉内化疗对改善晚期宫颈癌的预后有用,但针对盆腔外复发的措施和个体化治疗被认为可进一步改善预后。