Suppr超能文献

用于检测尿液中丁丙诺啡的酶免疫测定法验证

Enzyme immunoassay validation for the detection of buprenorphine in urine.

作者信息

Cirimele V, Kintz P, Lohner S, Ludes B

机构信息

Institut de Médecine Légale, Laboratoire de Toxicologie, 11, rue Humann, 67085 Strasbourg, France.

出版信息

J Anal Toxicol. 2003 Mar;27(2):103-5. doi: 10.1093/jat/27.2.103.

Abstract

A solid-phase enzyme immunoassay involving microtiter plates was proposed by Microgenics to screen buprenorphine in urine. The intra-assay precision at 10 ng/mL was 7.7% (coefficient of variation). The immunoassay was determined to have no cross-reactivity with codeine, dihydrocodeine, morphine, ethylmorphine, 6-monoacetylmorphine, methadone, pholcodine, propoxyphene, dextromoramide, and dextromethorphan at 1 and 10 mg/L. A low cross-reactivity (3% at 1 ng/mL) was observed at low concentrations of norbuprenorphine. After comparing this new immunological test (Singlestep ELISA) for 76 urine specimens with our validated high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray mass spectrometry (HPLC-ES-MS) procedure, an optimum cutoff concentration of 2 ng/mL was determined for the kit. At this cutoff, the screening assay was able to determine more than 90% of true results with 43.4% true positives and 48.7% true negatives. Four positive urines (5.3%) were not confirmed by HPLC-ES-MS. In only one case, the negative urine test was confirmed as positive by HPLC-ES-MS (buprenorphine: 62.5 ng/mL). Buprenorphine concentrations determined by HPLC-ES-MS ranged from 1.2 to 1052 ng/mL. Of the four potential adulterants (hypochloride 50 mL/L, sodium nitrite 50 g/L, liquid soap 50 mL/L, and sodium chloride 50 g/L) that might be added to a positive urine specimen, none were able to cause a false-negative response by the immunoassay. The results of this study support the concept that the Singlestep ELISA for buprenorphine determination in urine should be considered as a new, valided screening procedure.

摘要

Microgenics公司提出了一种基于微量滴定板的固相酶免疫分析法,用于筛查尿液中的丁丙诺啡。在10 ng/mL时,该检测方法的批内精密度为7.7%(变异系数)。经测定,该免疫分析法在1和10 mg/L浓度下,与可待因、二氢可待因、吗啡、乙基吗啡、6-单乙酰吗啡、美沙酮、福尔可定、丙氧芬、右吗拉胺和右美沙芬均无交叉反应。在低浓度的去甲丁丙诺啡下,观察到较低的交叉反应(1 ng/mL时为3%)。将这种新的免疫检测方法(单步ELISA)与我们经验证的高效液相色谱-电喷雾质谱法(HPLC-ES-MS)对76份尿液标本进行比较后,确定该试剂盒的最佳截断浓度为2 ng/mL。在此截断值下,筛查检测方法能够确定超过90%的真实结果,真阳性率为43.4%,真阴性率为48.7%。有4份阳性尿液(5.3%)未被HPLC-ES-MS法确认。仅在1例中,HPLC-ES-MS法将阴性尿液检测确认为阳性(丁丙诺啡:62.5 ng/mL)。HPLC-ES-MS法测定的丁丙诺啡浓度范围为1.2至1052 ng/mL。对于可能添加到阳性尿液标本中的4种潜在掺假物质(50 mL/L次氯酸盐、50 g/L亚硝酸钠、50 mL/L液体肥皂和50 g/L氯化钠),没有一种能够导致免疫分析法出现假阴性反应。本研究结果支持这样一种观点,即用于尿液中丁丙诺啡测定的单步ELISA法应被视为一种新的、经过验证的筛查方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验