• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于法医尿液样本中检测海洛因使用情况的Microgenics CEDIA海洛因代谢物(6-单乙酰吗啡)检测法与罗氏Abuscreen ONLINE阿片类免疫分析法的比较。

Comparison of the Microgenics CEDIA heroin metabolite (6-AM) and the Roche Abuscreen ONLINE opiate immunoassays for the detection of heroin use in forensic urine samples.

作者信息

Holler Justin M, Bosy Thomas Z, Klette Kevin L, Wiegand Russel, Jemionek John, Jacobs Aaron

机构信息

Office of the Armed Forces Medical Examiner, Division of Forensic Toxicology, AFIP, 1413 Research Blvd., Bldg. 102, Rockville, Maryland 20850, USA.

出版信息

J Anal Toxicol. 2004 Sep;28(6):489-93. doi: 10.1093/jat/28.6.489.

DOI:10.1093/jat/28.6.489
PMID:15516301
Abstract

Current Department of Defense (DoD) and Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) procedures for the detection of heroin abuse by testing urine utilize an initial opiate (codeine/morphine) immunoassay (IA) screen followed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) confirmation of 6-acetylmorphine (6-AM), if the morphine concentration is above established cutoff. An alternative to the current opiates screen for heroin abuse is the direct IA for the metabolite of heroin, 6-acetylmorphine. In this regard, the performance of the Microgenics CEDIA heroin metabolite (6-AM) screening reagent was assessed. This evaluation was conducted on the P module of a Hitachi Modular automated IA analyzer calibrated using 6-AM at 10 ng/mL. Reproducibility, linearity, accuracy, sensitivity, and interferences associated with use of the 6-AM IA reagent were evaluated. The IA reagent precision (percent coefficient of variation (%CV)) around each of seven standards was less than 0.63%, with a linearity (r(2)) value of 0.9951. A total of 37,713 active duty service members' urine samples were analyzed simultaneously using the CEDIA heroin metabolite (6-AM) reagent and the Roche Abuscreen ONLINE opiate reagent to evaluate both the prevalence rate of 6-AM in the demographic group and the sensitivity and specificity of the reagents for the detection of heroin use. Of the 37,713 samples tested using the CEDIA heroin metabolite (6-AM) reagent, three samples screened positive at the DoD and HHS cutoff of 10 ng/mL. One of the three samples confirmed positive for 6-AM by GC-MS above the cutoff of 10 ng/mL, the two remaining samples confirmed negative for 6-AM at a GC-MS limit of detection (LOD) of 2.1 ng/mL. In contrast, the Roche Abuscreen ONLINE opiate IA produced 74 opiate-positive results for codeine/morphine, with 6 of the 74 specimens confirming positive for morphine above the DoD cutoff concentration of 4000 ng/mL (8% DoD morphine confirmation rate), only one of the 74 opiate-positive screen specimens confirmed positive for 6-AM above the 10 ng/mL GC-MS cutoff concentration. As a further check of the sensitivity and specificity of the Microgenics 6-AM IA reagent, human urine samples (n = 87) known to contain 6-AM by GC-MS, were re-analyzed using both IA reagents. All 87 of the samples screened positive using the CEDIA heroin metabolite (6-AM) assay. However, using the Roche ONLINE opiate reagent, 12 of the known 6-AM positives screened negative at the DoD and HHS screening cutoff of 2000 ng/mL (morphine). Of the remaining 75 samples that screened positive by the ONLINE opiate reagent, five of the samples did not contain morphine above the DoD GC-MS cutoff concentration of 4000 ng/mL and would not have required 6-AM analysis. However, under the HHS GC-MS morphine cutoff concentration of 2000 ng/mL all 75 samples would have required 6-AM analysis. Furthermore, using the current DoD opiate screen, 17 out of 87 samples known to contain 6-AM would have gone undetected (19.5% false-negative rate); additionally, even under the more stringent HHS opiate screening standards 12 out of the 87 samples known to contain 6-AM would also have gone undetected (13.8% false-negative rate). The Microgenics CEDIA heroin metabolite (6-AM) reagent assay appears well adapted for the rapid and specific detection of heroin abuse as an alternative for, or an adjunct test to, the current opiates (codeine/morphine) IA screening procedure.

摘要

美国国防部(DoD)和美国卫生与公众服务部(HHS)目前通过尿液检测来发现海洛因滥用情况的程序,是先利用初始的阿片类物质(可待因/吗啡)免疫分析(IA)进行筛查,若吗啡浓度高于既定临界值,则随后采用气相色谱 - 质谱联用(GC - MS)对6 - 乙酰吗啡(6 - AM)进行确认。用于海洛因滥用检测的当前阿片类物质筛查的替代方法,是针对海洛因代谢物6 - 乙酰吗啡的直接免疫分析。在这方面,对Microgenics CEDIA海洛因代谢物(6 - AM)筛查试剂的性能进行了评估。该评估在日立模块化自动免疫分析仪的P模块上进行,使用浓度为10 ng/mL的6 - AM进行校准。评估了与使用6 - AM免疫分析试剂相关的重复性、线性、准确性、灵敏度和干扰情况。围绕七个标准品中每一个的免疫分析试剂精密度(变异系数百分比(%CV))均小于0.63%,线性(r(2))值为0.9951。同时使用CEDIA海洛因代谢物(6 - AM)试剂和罗氏Abuscreen ONLINE阿片类物质试剂对37713名现役军人的尿液样本进行分析,以评估该人群中6 - AM的流行率以及试剂检测海洛因使用情况的灵敏度和特异性。在使用CEDIA海洛因代谢物(6 - AM)试剂检测的37713个样本中,有3个样本在国防部和卫生与公众服务部10 ng/mL的临界值下筛查呈阳性。这三个样本中有一个通过GC - MS确认6 - AM在10 ng/mL的临界值以上呈阳性,其余两个样本在GC - MS检测限(LOD)为2.1 ng/mL时6 - AM确认呈阴性。相比之下,罗氏Abuscreen ONLINE阿片类物质免疫分析对可待因/吗啡产生了74个阿片类物质阳性结果,在74个样本中有6个样本确认吗啡在国防部临界浓度4000 ng/mL以上呈阳性(国防部吗啡确认率为8%),74个阿片类物质阳性筛查样本中只有一个在GC - MS临界浓度10 ng/mL以上确认6 - AM呈阳性。作为对Microgenics 6 - AM免疫分析试剂灵敏度和特异性的进一步检查,对已知通过GC - MS含有6 - AM的人类尿液样本(n = 87)使用两种免疫分析试剂重新进行分析。使用CEDIA海洛因代谢物(6 - AM)检测法,所有87个样本筛查均呈阳性。然而,使用罗氏ONLINE阿片类物质试剂,在国防部和卫生与公众服务部2000 ng/mL(吗啡)的筛查临界值下,已知的87个6 - AM阳性样本中有12个筛查呈阴性。在通过ONLINE阿片类物质试剂筛查呈阳性的其余75个样本中,有5个样本的吗啡含量未超过国防部GC - MS临界浓度4000 ng/mL,本不需要进行6 - AM分析。然而在卫生与公众服务部GC - MS吗啡临界浓度2000 ng/mL的情况下,所有75个样本都需要进行6 - AM分析。此外,使用当前国防部的阿片类物质筛查方法,已知含有6 - AM的87个样本中有17个会未被检测到(假阴性率为19.5%);此外,即使在更严格的卫生与公众服务部阿片类物质筛查标准下,已知含有6 - AM的87个样本中仍有12个会未被检测到(假阴性率为13.8%)。Microgenics CEDIA海洛因代谢物(6 - AM)试剂检测法似乎非常适合作为当前阿片类物质(可待因/吗啡)免疫分析筛查程序的替代方法或辅助检测方法,用于快速、特异性地检测海洛因滥用情况。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the Microgenics CEDIA heroin metabolite (6-AM) and the Roche Abuscreen ONLINE opiate immunoassays for the detection of heroin use in forensic urine samples.用于法医尿液样本中检测海洛因使用情况的Microgenics CEDIA海洛因代谢物(6-单乙酰吗啡)检测法与罗氏Abuscreen ONLINE阿片类免疫分析法的比较。
J Anal Toxicol. 2004 Sep;28(6):489-93. doi: 10.1093/jat/28.6.489.
2
Detection of opiate use in a methadone maintenance treatment population with the CEDIA 6-acetylmorphine and CEDIA DAU opiate assays.采用CEDIA 6-乙酰吗啡和CEDIA DAU阿片类药物检测法对美沙酮维持治疗人群中的阿片类药物使用情况进行检测。
J Anal Toxicol. 2001 Oct;25(7):515-9. doi: 10.1093/jat/25.7.515.
3
Detection times and analytical performance of commercial urine opiate immunoassays following heroin administration.海洛因给药后商用尿液阿片免疫分析的检测时间和分析性能。
J Anal Toxicol. 2000 Oct;24(7):522-9. doi: 10.1093/jat/24.7.522.
4
Paradoxical results in urine drug testing for 6-acetylmorphine and total opiates: implications for best analytical strategy.6-乙酰吗啡和总阿片类药物尿液药物检测中的矛盾结果:对最佳分析策略的影响
J Anal Toxicol. 2006 Mar;30(2):73-9. doi: 10.1093/jat/30.2.73.
5
Monitoring opiate use in substance abuse treatment patients with sweat and urine drug testing.通过汗液和尿液药物检测监测药物滥用治疗患者中的阿片类药物使用情况。
J Anal Toxicol. 2000 Oct;24(7):509-21. doi: 10.1093/jat/24.7.509.
6
Evaluation of the Cedia heroin metabolite (6-AM) immunoassay with urine specimens from A criminal justice drug-testing program.采用刑事司法药物检测项目的尿液标本对Cedia海洛因代谢物(6-AM)免疫分析法进行评估。
J Anal Toxicol. 2005 Apr;29(3):201-4. doi: 10.1093/jat/29.3.201.
7
Concentrations of unconjugated morphine, codeine and 6-acetylmorphine in urine specimens from suspected drugged drivers.疑似药物致驾者尿液样本中游离吗啡、可待因和6-乙酰吗啡的浓度。
J Forensic Sci. 2002 Mar;47(2):366-8.
8
Forensic drug testing for opiates. V. Urine testing for heroin, morphine, and codeine with commercial opiate immunoassays.阿片类药物的法医检测。五、使用商用阿片类免疫分析法对尿液中的海洛因、吗啡和可待因进行检测。
J Anal Toxicol. 1993 May-Jun;17(3):156-64. doi: 10.1093/jat/17.3.156.
9
Concentration ratios of morphine to codeine in blood of impaired drivers as evidence of heroin use and not medication with codeine.受损驾驶员血液中吗啡与可待因的浓度比可作为使用海洛因而非服用可待因药物的证据。
Clin Chem. 2001 Nov;47(11):1980-4.
10
Urine benzodiazepine screening using Roche Online KIMS immunoassay with beta-glucuronidase hydrolysis and confirmation by gas chromatography- mass spectrometry.采用罗氏在线KIMS免疫分析法并经β-葡萄糖醛酸酶水解进行尿液苯二氮䓬筛查,并用气相色谱-质谱法进行确证。
J Anal Toxicol. 2005 Apr;29(3):193-200. doi: 10.1093/jat/29.3.193.

引用本文的文献

1
Current drug use and lack of HIV virologic suppression: point-of-care urine drug screen versus self-report.目前的药物使用情况和 HIV 病毒学抑制失败:即时尿液药物检测与自我报告。
BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Sep 18;14:508. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-508.
2
Toxicologic testing for opiates: understanding false-positive and false-negative test results.阿片类药物的毒理学检测:理解假阳性和假阴性检测结果
Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2012;14(4). doi: 10.4088/PCC.12f01371. Epub 2012 Jul 26.