Neo Masashi, Matsushita Mutsumi, Iwashita Yasushi, Yasuda Tadashi, Sakamoto Takeshi, Nakamura Takashi
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Apr 1;28(7):666-70. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000051919.14927.57.
The feasibility of inserting a screw for the narrow isthmus with a high-riding vertebral artery was evaluated in patients subjected to posterior atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation.
To demonstrate the feasibility of inserting bilateral screws and obtaining a stable atlantoaxial complex for patients with a high-riding vertebral artery.
Posterior atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation entails the potential risk of vertebral artery injury, which may be lethal. The risk is much higher for the narrow isthmus caused by a high-riding vertebral artery, and many authors recommend that the procedure should be abandoned if the isthmus is too narrow. On the other hand, bilateral screw fixation is stronger than unilateral screw fixation.
For this study 27 consecutive patients who submitted to atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation were evaluated before surgery for the position of the vertebral artery grooves using computed tomography (CT) reconstruction. Seven of the patients were defined as having a unilateral high-riding vertebral artery. For these patients, bilateral screw insertion through the most posterior and medial part of the isthmus was performed.
No massive bleeding or major complications were encountered in any patients with a high-riding vertebral artery. Postoperative computed tomography reconstruction demonstrated that five of the screws cleared the vertebral artery groove successfully, and two slightly breached it. No screws penetrated into the vertebral artery groove.
It is possible to insert a screw safely, even into the narrow isthmus with a high-riding vertebral artery, if the surgeon realizes where the screw should be inserted and has the requisite insertion technique. Bilateral screw fixation should provide a high fusion rate.
在接受寰枢椎后路经关节螺钉固定的患者中,评估为狭窄峡部且椎动脉高位走行时插入螺钉的可行性。
证明对于椎动脉高位走行的患者,插入双侧螺钉并获得稳定的寰枢复合体的可行性。
寰枢椎后路经关节螺钉固定存在椎动脉损伤的潜在风险,这可能是致命的。对于由椎动脉高位走行导致的狭窄峡部,风险要高得多,许多作者建议,如果峡部过窄,应放弃该手术。另一方面,双侧螺钉固定比单侧螺钉固定更牢固。
本研究对27例接受寰枢椎经关节螺钉固定的连续患者术前使用计算机断层扫描(CT)重建评估椎动脉沟的位置。其中7例患者被定义为单侧椎动脉高位走行。对于这些患者,通过峡部最靠后和内侧部分进行双侧螺钉插入。
所有椎动脉高位走行的患者均未出现大出血或严重并发症。术后CT重建显示,5枚螺钉成功避开椎动脉沟,2枚略有突破,但无螺钉穿入椎动脉沟。
如果外科医生清楚螺钉的插入位置并具备必要的插入技术,即使是在椎动脉高位走行的狭窄峡部,也可以安全地插入螺钉。双侧螺钉固定应能提供较高的融合率。