Shah Varsha I, Raju Usha, Chitale Dhananjay, Deshpande Vikram, Gregory Nancy, Strand Vernon
Department of Pathology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan 48202, USA.
Cancer. 2003 Apr 15;97(8):1824-31. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11278.
A benign diagnosis in a core needle biopsy (CNBx) of the breast performed for a clinically and/or radiologically suspicious abnormality is often due to a nonrepresentative sample. However, the discordance may not be recognized, resulting in a logistic delay in the diagnosis.
Twenty-seven false-negative CNBxs were identified in 952 consecutive CNBxs of the breast (653 benign, 266 malignant, and 33 atypical) performed during a 1-year period. Biopsies were analyzed with respect to clinical and radiologic findings, biopsy type, type of malignancy, and interval between the original CNBx and final diagnosis. Four hundred thirty-eight (67%) of the patients with a benign CNBx diagnosis either underwent excision or had a minimum of 1-year follow-up (mean, 35.6 months; median, 36 months).
The cancers missed on CNBx included 6 ductal carcinomas in situ, 17 invasive ductal carcinomas, 3 invasive lobular carcinomas, and 1 non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The overall false-negative rate was 9.1%. For palpable lesions, ultrasound-guided CNBx had a lower rate of missed cancer (3.6%) compared with CNBx without image guidance (13.3%). The false-negative rate for vacuum assisted CNBx biopsy was 7.6% (3.3% for the 11-gauge needle, 22.2% for the 14-gauge needle; 5.6% for nonpalpable mass lesions, 8.2% for microcalcifications). In all seven false-negative CNBxs performed by radiologists, the discordance between the radiologic and pathologic findings was promptly recognized due to their standard follow-up protocol. The discordance between the degree of clinical suspicion, radiologic impression, and the pathologic findings was not immediately recognized in 5 of 20 false-negative CNBxs performed by surgeons (4 without radiologic guidance and 1 with ultrasound guidance), resulting in a delay in the diagnosis ranging from 112-336 days.
A false-negative diagnosis of breast carcinoma was found to be more common in CNBx performed without image guidance but occurred to a lesser degree in image-guided biopsies. A delay in diagnosis can be avoided by establishing a standard post-CNBx follow-up protocol.
因临床和/或放射学检查发现可疑异常而进行的乳腺粗针穿刺活检(CNBx)得出良性诊断结果,往往是由于样本不具代表性。然而,这种不一致可能未被识别,从而导致诊断过程出现逻辑上的延迟。
在为期1年的时间里,对952例连续的乳腺CNBx(653例良性、266例恶性和33例不典型)进行分析,从中识别出27例假阴性CNBx。分析活检的临床和放射学检查结果、活检类型、恶性肿瘤类型以及初次CNBx与最终诊断之间的间隔时间。438例(67%)CNBx诊断为良性的患者接受了切除手术或至少进行了1年的随访(平均35.6个月;中位数36个月)。
CNBx漏诊的癌症包括6例导管原位癌、17例浸润性导管癌、3例浸润性小叶癌和1例非霍奇金淋巴瘤。总体假阴性率为9.1%。对于可触及的病变,超声引导下的CNBx漏诊癌症的发生率(3.6%)低于无图像引导的CNBx(13.3%)。真空辅助CNBx活检的假阴性率为7.6%(11号针为3.3%,14号针为22.2%;不可触及的肿块病变为5.6%,微钙化灶为8.2%)。在放射科医生进行的所有7例假阴性CNBx中,由于其标准的随访方案,放射学和病理学检查结果之间的不一致能够迅速被识别。在外科医生进行的20例假阴性CNBx中,有5例(4例无放射学引导,1例有超声引导)未立即识别出临床怀疑程度、放射学印象与病理学检查结果之间的不一致,导致诊断延迟112 - 336天。
发现在无图像引导下进行的乳腺CNBx中,乳腺癌假阴性诊断更为常见,但在图像引导活检中发生率较低。通过建立标准的CNBx术后随访方案,可以避免诊断延迟。