Zhang Wenyi, Endo Satoru, Ishikawa Masayori, Ikeda Hideo, Hoshi Masaharu
International Radiation Information Center, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan.
J Radiat Res. 2002 Dec;43(4):397-403. doi: 10.1269/jrr.43.397.
The relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of mixed neutron and gamma-ray radiation emitted at a 252Cf source at the Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, compared with 60Co gamma-ray radiation was determined. The tissue-absorbed dose contribution of the accompanying gamma radiation was about 35.7% to the total tissue-absorbed dose from the 252Cf mixed radiation. The 252Cf mixed radiation and 60Co gamma rays produced approximate linear changes in the frequency of micronuclei induced in root-tip cells of Allium cepa L. onion seedlings after irradiation as dry dormant seeds with varying absorbed doses in onion seeds. Therefore, the RBE for radiation-induced micronuclei was calculated as the ratio of the slopes for the 252Cf mixed radiation and the 60Co gamma rays. The deduced RBE value of 252Cf mixed radiation to 60Co gamma rays to induce micronuclei in dry dormant onion seed cells was about 90.5 +/- 3.6 (+/- 1sigma); the RBE of neutrons from the 252Cf mixed radiation was about 150 +/- 6 (+/- 1sigma). Furthermore, the sensitivity ratio of the induction rate of micronuclei in dry dormant seeds to that in seedlings by neutrons from 252Cf mixed radiation was significantly different from that by 60Co gamma rays. From these results, we concluded that the repair efficiency of DNA damage induced by neutrons may be different from that by gamma rays.
测定了广岛大学放射生物学与医学研究所252Cf源发射的混合中子和γ射线辐射相对于60Coγ射线辐射的相对生物效能(RBE)。伴随的γ辐射对252Cf混合辐射所致总组织吸收剂量的组织吸收剂量贡献约为35.7%。用不同吸收剂量的252Cf混合辐射和60Coγ射线照射处于干燥休眠状态的洋葱种子后,在洋葱根尖细胞中诱导产生的微核频率呈现近似线性变化。因此,辐射诱导微核的RBE通过计算252Cf混合辐射和60Coγ射线斜率的比值得出。在干燥休眠的洋葱种子细胞中,252Cf混合辐射相对于60Coγ射线诱导微核的推导RBE值约为90.5±3.6(±1σ);252Cf混合辐射中中子的RBE约为150±6(±1σ)。此外,252Cf混合辐射中的中子在干燥休眠种子中诱导微核的速率与在幼苗中诱导微核的速率之比的敏感率,与60Coγ射线的该比值有显著差异。从这些结果,我们得出结论,中子诱导的DNA损伤修复效率可能与γ射线诱导的不同。