Crack babies and the Constitution: ruminations about addicted pregnant women after Ferguson v. City of Charleston.

作者信息

Marrus Ellen

机构信息

Clinical Legal Foundation, University of Houston Law Center, USA.

出版信息

Villanova Law Rev. 2002;47(2):299-340.

PMID:12680368

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Crack babies and the Constitution: ruminations about addicted pregnant women after Ferguson v. City of Charleston.

Villanova Law Rev. 2002;47(2):299-340.

What about my right to privacy? Where the Court went wrong in Ferguson v. City of Charleston.

Brooklyn Law Rev. 2001 Fall;67(1):261-92.

Inside the womb: interpreting the Ferguson case.

Duke J Gend Law Policy. 2002 Summer;9:81-90.

A feminist Fourth Amendment?: Consent, care, privacy, and social meaning in Ferguson v. City of Charleston.

Duke J Gend Law Policy. 2002 Summer;9:1-79.

A limited role for the legal system in responding to maternal substance abuse during pregnancy.

Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy. 1991;5(3):747-81.

Punitive versus public health oriented responses to drug use by pregnant women.

Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics. 2001 Spring;1:217-35.

Compelled hospitalization and treatment during pregnancy: mental health statutes as models for legislation to protect children from prenatal drug and alcohol exposure.

Fam Law Q. 1991 Summer;25(2):149-70.

Punitive policies: constitutional hazards of non-consensual testing of women for prenatal drug use.

Health Matrix Clevel. 1995 Summer;5(2):443-82.

High court bars some drug tests.

N Y Times Web. 2001 Mar 22:A1, A22.

Pregnant substance abusers: a problem that won't go away.

St Marys Law J. 1994;25(2):623-73.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验