Halliwell Barry
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, MD 7 #03-07, 8 Medical Drive, Singapore 117597, Singapore.
FEBS Lett. 2003 Apr 10;540(1-3):3-6. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(03)00235-7.
Cell culture studies have given much valuable information about mechanisms of metabolism and signal transduction and of regulation of gene expression, proliferation, senescence, and death. However, cells in culture may behave differently from cells in vivo in many ways. One of these is that cell culture imposes a state of oxidative stress on cells. I argue that cells that survive and grow in culture might use ROS-dependent signal transduction pathways that rarely or never operate in vivo. A further problem is that cell culture media can catalyse the oxidation of compounds added to them, resulting in apparent cellular effects that are in fact due to oxidation products such as ROS. Such artefacts may have affected many studies on the effects of ascorbate, thiols, flavonoids and other polyphenolic compounds on cells in culture.
细胞培养研究已经提供了许多关于代谢机制、信号转导以及基因表达调控、细胞增殖、衰老和死亡的有价值信息。然而,培养中的细胞在许多方面可能与体内细胞表现不同。其中之一是细胞培养会给细胞施加一种氧化应激状态。我认为在培养中存活并生长的细胞可能会利用活性氧(ROS)依赖的信号转导途径,而这些途径在体内很少或从不发挥作用。另一个问题是细胞培养基会催化添加到其中的化合物的氧化,从而产生表面上的细胞效应,而这些效应实际上是由ROS等氧化产物引起的。这类人为因素可能影响了许多关于抗坏血酸、硫醇、类黄酮和其他多酚类化合物对培养细胞影响的研究。