Suppr超能文献

环氧化酶-2特异性抑制剂与肾脏:对高血压和水肿的影响。

COX-2-specific inhibitors and the kidney: effect on hypertension and oedema.

作者信息

Whelton Andrew

机构信息

Universal Clinical Research Center, Inc., Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

J Hypertens Suppl. 2002 Sep;20(6):S31-5.

Abstract

Recent studies have investigated the renal and cardiovascular safety of celecoxib and rofecoxib. Both agents have been studied in long-term safety trials: the Celecoxib Long-Term Safety Study (CLASS) and Vioxx Gastrointestinal Outcomes Research Study (VIGOR). Renal safety was investigated in CLASS and the results indicated that celecoxib (even at the supratherapeutic 800 mg daily doses used in CLASS) is associated with lower rates of renal side effects than conventional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The renal safety of celecoxib was also assessed in healthy elderly subjects. In these subjects, celecoxib administration was associated with minimal effects on glomerular filtration rate compared with naproxen, while urinary sodium and prostaglandin E2 excretion were similar. Celecoxib and rofecoxib were compared with each other in two studies of elderly hypertensive patients with osteoarthritis (OA). These patients were treated with usual therapeutic doses of celecoxib (200 mg daily) or rofecoxib (25 mg daily). In the first study, celecoxib treatment had a significantly lower incidence of peripheral oedema than rofecoxib (4.9% versus 9.5%, P = 0.014). The second study confirmed the results of the initial study: the incidence of oedema was again lower with celecoxib than with rofecoxib (4.7% versus 7.7%, P < 0.05). Rofecoxib use was also associated with significantly greater mean and clinically relevant increases in systolic blood pressure than celecoxib. The CLASS study, which evaluated cardiovascular safety, showed that celecoxib treatment was not associated with an increase in myocardial infarction (MI) compared with non-selective NSAIDs (incidence in all patients was 0.3% for celecoxib and 0.3% for conventional NSAIDs). In a 12-week study of celecoxib (the Successive Celecoxib Efficacy and Safety Studies, SUCCESS-1) in more than 13000 patients with OA, combined doses of celecoxib (200 mg and 400 mg daily) and conventional NSAIDs (naproxen 1000 mg daily and diclofenac 100 mg daily) were again associated with similar rates of cardiovascular adverse events, including MI. However, in the VIGOR trial, treatment with rofecoxib was associated with a significantly higher rate of MI compared with naproxen (0.4% compared with 0.1% in the naproxen group, P < 0.05). In summary, celecoxib may have safety and tolerability advantages compared with non-selective NSAIDs studied and may have some cardiorenal benefits compared with rofecoxib.

摘要

近期研究调查了塞来昔布和罗非昔布的肾脏及心血管安全性。这两种药物都进行了长期安全性试验:塞来昔布长期安全性研究(CLASS)和万络胃肠道转归研究(VIGOR)。CLASS研究对肾脏安全性进行了调查,结果表明,塞来昔布(即使是CLASS中使用的超治疗剂量每日800毫克)与传统非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)相比,肾脏副作用发生率更低。还对健康老年受试者评估了塞来昔布的肾脏安全性。在这些受试者中,与萘普生相比,服用塞来昔布对肾小球滤过率的影响最小,而尿钠和前列腺素E2排泄情况相似。在两项针对老年骨关节炎(OA)高血压患者的研究中,对塞来昔布和罗非昔布进行了相互比较。这些患者接受塞来昔布(每日200毫克)或罗非昔布(每日25毫克)的常规治疗剂量。在第一项研究中,塞来昔布治疗组外周水肿的发生率显著低于罗非昔布治疗组(4.9%对9.5%,P = 0.014)。第二项研究证实了初步研究的结果:塞来昔布治疗组水肿发生率再次低于罗非昔布治疗组(4.7%对7.7%,P < 0.05)。使用罗非昔布还与收缩压的平均升高及临床上显著的升高显著相关,且高于塞来昔布。评估心血管安全性的CLASS研究表明,与非选择性NSAIDs相比,塞来昔布治疗与心肌梗死(MI)增加无关(所有患者中塞来昔布组和传统NSAIDs组的发生率均为0.3%)。在一项针对13000多名OA患者的塞来昔布12周研究(连续塞来昔布疗效和安全性研究,SUCCESS - 1)中,塞来昔布(每日200毫克和400毫克)与传统NSAIDs(每日萘普生1000毫克和双氯芬酸100毫克)的联合剂量再次与包括MI在内的心血管不良事件发生率相似。然而,在VIGOR试验中,与萘普生相比,罗非昔布治疗与显著更高的MI发生率相关(萘普生组为0.1%,罗非昔布组为0.4%,P < 0.05)。总之,与所研究的非选择性NSAIDs相比,塞来昔布可能具有安全性和耐受性优势,与罗非昔布相比可能具有一些心肾方面的益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验