Johnston C D, Rayner J L, Briegel D
CSIRO Land and Water. Private Bag No. 5, Wembley, W.A., 6913, Australia.
J Contam Hydrol. 2002 Nov;59(1-2):87-111. doi: 10.1016/s0169-7722(02)00077-3.
In situ air sparging has the potential to augment the removal of nonaqueous phase liquid (NAPL) contaminants in soil vapour extraction (SVE) systems when the NAPL is present in the capillary fringe or below the water table. NAPL removal can also be enhanced from above the water table by improving air access. Results are presented from a pilot-scale field trial aimed at evaluating the performance of such a remediation strategy where in situ air sparging was used in conjunction with a soil vapour extraction system to remove weathered gasoline NAPL from an unconfined sandy aquifer. A simple analysis that partitions extracted soil vapour between air injected through the sparge well and air drawn from the atmosphere across the soil surface, together with petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in the extracted soil vapour, was used to interpret the effectiveness of air sparging. The composition and mass of the NAPL in the aquifer were also monitored along with observations on the distribution of air in the aquifer. Results showed that sparged air constituted 42% of the extracted soil vapour but contributed the majority of the petroleum hydrocarbons removed. For the first 5 days of sparging, hydrocarbon concentrations in the sparged air were in equilibrium with the NAPL in the aquifer leading to total petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in the combined system being three to four times greater than for soil vapour extraction alone. Petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in the extracted soil vapour decreased over time as a result of the depletion of the more volatile constituents from the NAPL, possible development of mass transfer limitations and increased fraction of clean air from depleted zones. Overall, 65% of the 673 kg of petroleum hydrocarbons extracted in soil vapour over a period of 30 days was carried in sparged air from the single sparge well. Percentages of the mass carried in the sparged air were even higher (median 70%) for individual aromatic hydrocarbons. Inclusion of air sparging increased the mass extracted by a factor of 1.9 (more for individual petroleum hydrocarbons) over and above that for soil vapour extraction alone for the 30 days of sparging. Air sparging was also effective in removing residual NAPL from below the water table. The mass of petroleum hydrocarbons removed from the site was not reflected in changes to the mass of NAPL in the aquifer. This result is apparently due to lateral inflow of NAPL to the site although evidence of a depleted source of volatilised hydrocarbons suggests the possible development of mass transfer limitations.
当非水相液体(NAPL)存在于毛细边缘或地下水位以下时,原位空气注射有潜力增强土壤气相抽提(SVE)系统中NAPL污染物的去除效果。通过改善空气进入情况,也可以增强地下水位以上NAPL的去除效果。本文给出了一个中试规模现场试验的结果,该试验旨在评估这样一种修复策略的性能,即原位空气注射与土壤气相抽提系统联合使用,以从未承压的砂质含水层中去除风化汽油NAPL。通过一个简单的分析来解释空气注射的有效性,该分析将抽提的土壤气相在通过注射井注入的空气和从土壤表面穿过大气吸入的空气之间进行划分,并结合抽提的土壤气相中的石油烃浓度。同时还监测了含水层中NAPL的组成和质量以及含水层中空气分布的观测情况。结果表明,注射的空气占抽提的土壤气相的42%,但贡献了去除的大部分石油烃。在注射的前5天,注射空气中的烃浓度与含水层中的NAPL处于平衡状态,导致联合系统中的总石油烃浓度比单独的土壤气相抽提高三到四倍。由于NAPL中挥发性更强的成分被耗尽、可能出现传质限制以及来自耗尽区的清洁空气比例增加,抽提的土壤气相中的石油烃浓度随时间下降。总体而言,在30天内从土壤气相中抽提的673千克石油烃中,65%是通过单个注射井注射的空气携带的。对于单个芳烃,注射空气中携带的质量百分比甚至更高(中位数为70%)。在30天的注射期间,加入空气注射使抽提的质量比单独的土壤气相抽提增加了1.9倍(单个石油烃增加更多)。空气注射对于从地下水位以下去除残留的NAPL也很有效。从场地去除的石油烃质量并未反映在含水层中NAPL质量的变化上。这一结果显然是由于NAPL向场地的侧向流入,尽管有证据表明挥发烃源已耗尽,这表明可能出现了传质限制。