Van Dillen Linda R, Sahrmann Shirley A, Norton Barbara J, Caldwell Cheryl A, McDonnell Mary Kate, Bloom Nancy J
Program in Physical Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003 Mar;33(3):126-42. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2003.33.3.126.
Cross-sectional study of patients with mechanical low back pain (MLBP).
To test the construct validity of 3 categories of a movement system impairment-based classification proposed for use with patients with MLBP.
A pathoanatomic basis for directing treatment has not proven useful in a wide variety of patients with MLBP. In addition, there is a paucity of data describing the movement system impairments that characterize many of the pathoanatomically based MLBP diagnoses. Because of the mechanical nature of MLBP, a system based on groups of signs and symptoms relevant to conservative management needs to be developed.
A movement system impairment-based classification was proposed that defined 5 categories of MLBP based on the findings from a standardized examination. Using the examination, 5 physical therapists examined a total of 188 patients with MLBP. A principal components analysis with an oblique rotation was conducted. Eigenvalues were plotted and a scree test was used to determine the number of factors to retain. A split-sample cross-validation procedure was conducted to verify the factor structure.
Three factors were identified in both samples: 2 factors related to symptoms with lumbar rotation and lumbar extension alignments or movements, and 1 factor related to signs of lumbar rotation with different alignments and movements.
Our results provide support for 3 factors related to 3 of the 5 proposed categories: lumbar rotation with extension, lumbar rotation, and lumbar extension. The existence of these 3 factors provides preliminary evidence for specific clusters of tests of alignment and movement impairments that could be used in classifying patients with MLBP into movement-system-related categories.
对机械性下背痛(MLBP)患者的横断面研究。
检验针对MLBP患者提出的基于运动系统损伤的3类分类法的结构效度。
指导治疗的病理解剖学基础在众多MLBP患者中未被证明有用。此外,描述许多基于病理解剖学的MLBP诊断所具有的运动系统损伤的数据匮乏。由于MLBP的机械性本质,需要开发一种基于与保守治疗相关的体征和症状组的系统。
提出了一种基于运动系统损伤的分类法,该分类法根据标准化检查结果定义了5类MLBP。5名物理治疗师使用该检查方法共检查了188例MLBP患者。进行了带有斜交旋转的主成分分析。绘制特征值并使用碎石图检验来确定保留的因子数量。进行了分割样本交叉验证程序以验证因子结构。
在两个样本中均识别出3个因子:2个因子与腰椎旋转和腰椎伸展对线或运动的症状相关,1个因子与不同对线和运动的腰椎旋转体征相关。
我们的结果为与所提出的5类中的3类相关的3个因子提供了支持:腰椎旋转伴伸展、腰椎旋转和腰椎伸展。这3个因子的存在为对线和运动损伤测试的特定聚类提供了初步证据,这些聚类可用于将MLBP患者分类到与运动系统相关的类别中。