Saghizadeh Mehrnoosh, Brown Donald J, Tajbakhsh Jian, Chen Zugen, Kenney M Cristina, Farber Debora B, Nelson Stanley F
Jules Stein Eye Institute, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Biomol Eng. 2003 Mar;20(3):97-106. doi: 10.1016/s1389-0344(03)00006-6.
Gene expression analyses using spotted cDNA microarrays typically require relatively large quantities of total RNA (up to 100 microg) or polyA+RNA (1-5 microg). However, samples obtained by microdissection, patient biopsies, or embryonic samples often are small and yield an insufficient amount of RNA. Methods such as linear RNA amplification by in vitro transcription (IVT) or cDNA amplification by PCR are currently being used to circumvent these limitations. In the present study, labeled probes from mouse liver and kidney were generated with two amplification methods and were analyzed in terms of reproducibility of intensity values from repeated experiments. In addition, the reliability of differential gene expression detection among the different types of amplified and non-amplified probes was assessed. Data derived from IVT-amplified RNA, as well as from PCR-amplified cDNA probes were reproducible with correlation coefficients of 0.89 and 0.91, respectively. 88-92% of the strongly differentially expressed genes detected with non-amplified probes were also detected as being at least two-folds differentially expressed with the amplified probes. Both the PCR-amplified probe and the IVT-amplified probe were comparable in reproducibility and reliability.
使用点阵cDNA微阵列进行基因表达分析通常需要相对大量的总RNA(高达100微克)或聚腺苷酸RNA(1 - 5微克)。然而,通过显微切割、患者活检或胚胎样本获得的样品往往量少,RNA产量不足。目前正在使用诸如通过体外转录(IVT)进行线性RNA扩增或通过PCR进行cDNA扩增等方法来克服这些限制。在本研究中,用两种扩增方法生成了来自小鼠肝脏和肾脏的标记探针,并根据重复实验强度值的可重复性进行了分析。此外,还评估了不同类型的扩增和未扩增探针之间差异基因表达检测的可靠性。来自IVT扩增RNA以及PCR扩增cDNA探针的数据具有可重复性,相关系数分别为0.89和0.91。用未扩增探针检测到的88 - 92%的强差异表达基因也被检测为与扩增探针至少有两倍的差异表达。PCR扩增探针和IVT扩增探针在可重复性和可靠性方面相当。