Neff Bryan D, Sherman Paul W
Department of Biology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5B7, Canada.
Anim Cogn. 2003 Jun;6(2):87-92. doi: 10.1007/s10071-003-0166-y. Epub 2003 Mar 28.
Parental care can be costly to a parent in terms of both time and energy invested in the young. In species with cuckoldry or brood parasitism not all of the young under a parent's care are necessarily offspring. In such cases, distinguishing between kin and non-kin, and investing only in the former (nepotism), can be advantageous. Bluegill sunfish ( Lepomis macrochirus) are characterized by paternal care and cuckoldry, and care-providing males appear to show nepotistic behaviours. Here, we investigated nestling recognition in bluegill, determining whether parental males can differentiate between young from their own nest (familiar and related) and young from non-neighbouring nests (unfamiliar and unrelated) using (1) visual and chemical cues, and (2) chemical cues only. In the first experiment, wild-caught parental males were presented with samples of eggs or fry (newly hatched eggs) collected from their own nest or a foreign nest and placed on opposite sides of an aquarium. The time these parental males spent associating with each sample, and their "pecking" behaviours (indicating cannibalism), were recorded. Parental males showed no preference between eggs from their own nest and eggs from a non-neighbouring nest, but they preferred to associate with fry from their own nest over foreign fry. There also was a positive relationship between male body size and the time spent associated with fry from their own nest. Parental males pecked at foreign fry more than 5 times as often as fry from their own nest, though this difference was not statistically significant. In the second experiment, fry that were collected from the nest of a wild-caught parental male or a non-neighbouring nest were placed in different containers and the water from each was dripped into opposite ends of an aquarium. The time the male spent on each side was recorded. In this case, parental males spent more time near the source of water conditioned by unrelated fry, but there was a positive relationship between male condition (fat reserves) and the time he spent near the source of water conditioned by fry from his own nest. Results confirm that chemicals cue nestling recognition by parental male bluegill.
亲代抚育对于亲代而言,在投入到幼崽身上的时间和精力方面可能代价高昂。在存在戴绿帽现象或巢寄生的物种中,在亲代照料下的幼崽并非全部必然是其后代。在这种情况下,区分亲属和非亲属,并仅对前者进行投资(裙带关系)可能是有利的。蓝鳃太阳鱼(Lepomis macrochirus)具有父性抚育和戴绿帽现象的特点,提供抚育的雄性似乎表现出裙带行为。在这里,我们研究了蓝鳃太阳鱼对雏鸟的识别能力,确定亲代雄性是否能够利用(1)视觉和化学线索,以及(2)仅利用化学线索,区分来自自己巢穴的幼崽(熟悉且有亲缘关系)和来自非相邻巢穴的幼崽(不熟悉且无亲缘关系)。在第一个实验中,将从野生捕获的亲代雄性自己的巢穴或外来巢穴收集的卵或鱼苗(新孵化的卵)样本放在水族箱的两侧,让亲代雄性接触。记录这些亲代雄性与每个样本相处的时间以及它们的“啄食”行为(表明同类相食)。亲代雄性对自己巢穴的卵和非相邻巢穴的卵没有偏好,但它们更喜欢与自己巢穴的鱼苗而不是外来鱼苗相处。雄性体型大小与与自己巢穴鱼苗相处的时间之间也存在正相关关系。亲代雄性啄食外来鱼苗的频率是自己巢穴鱼苗的5倍以上,尽管这种差异在统计学上并不显著。在第二个实验中,将从野生捕获的亲代雄性巢穴或非相邻巢穴收集的鱼苗放在不同的容器中,并将每个容器中的水滴入水族箱的相对两端。记录雄性在每一端花费的时间。在这种情况下,亲代雄性在由无亲缘关系的鱼苗调节的水源附近花费的时间更多,但雄性的身体状况(脂肪储备)与他在由自己巢穴的鱼苗调节的水源附近花费的时间之间存在正相关关系。结果证实,化学线索可用于亲代雄性蓝鳃太阳鱼识别雏鸟。