Defaye Pascal, Leclercq Jean-François, Guilleman Danièle, Scanu Patrice, Hazard Jean-René, Fatemi Marjaneh, Boursier Michel, Lambiez Marie
University Hospital, Hopital Michalon, BP 217, 38043 Grenoble, France.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003 Jan;26(1P2):214-20. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.00019.x.
The accuracy of information retrievable from the memories of DDDR pacing systems has been limited by the absence of actual electrograms confirming the proper sensing of spontaneous cardiac activity versus that of extraneous signals. This study examined the diagnostic power of a new arrhythmia interpretation scheme, which includes the recording and storage of high resolution endocavitary atrial and ventricular electrograms (HREGM). HREGM stored in the memories of new generation pacemakers (PM) in response to nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT), sustained VT, and atrial arrhythmias were analyzed in a follow-up registry of 520 patients at 1 month, and 3 to 6 months after implantation of a PM for standard indications. For each sequence of stored HREGM, the accuracy of the PM response was examined, classified as accurate (true positive), versus inaccurate (false positive), versus undetermined, and the relative contribution of the HREGM in verifying the PM diagnosis was measured. During a follow-up of 4.9 +/- 2 months, 256 (49%) of the 520 patients had an event recorded, which was confirmed to be arrhythmic on the basis of HREGM. Overall, approximately 34% of atrialtachy response (ATR) episodes were confirmed to be appropriate. Similar percentages of episodes were prompted by oversensing of signals unrelated to cardiac arrhythmias, while nearly 12% of the episodes could not be clarified because of such brief duration as to preclude recording of their onset. Approximately one-third of NSVT, and one-half of VT detections were false positive. Ventricular oversensing, most often due to myopotential interference in presence of unipolar sensing, and atrial undersensing were both identified as sources of false-positive detections of ventricular events. The proportion of true-positive detections was significantly higher in the bipolar (83%) than unipolar configuration. Among 520 PM recipients, miscellaneous episodes of atrial arrhythmias were confirmed by HREGM in 37% of patients within 3 to 6 months of follow-up. Atrial fibrillation was confirmed in only 6% of patients, of whom over 50% already had histories of atrial fibrillation. The prevalence of unsuspected atrial arrhythmia in this unselected population was lower than previously reported.
双腔双感知率(DDDR)起搏系统记忆中可检索信息的准确性一直受到限制,因为缺乏实际的心电信号来确认对自发性心脏活动与外部信号的正确感知。本研究检验了一种新的心律失常解读方案的诊断能力,该方案包括高分辨率心腔内心房和心室电图(HREGM)的记录和存储。在一项针对520例患者的随访登记研究中,分析了新一代起搏器(PM)记忆中存储的HREGM,这些患者因标准适应证植入PM后1个月、3至6个月时出现非持续性室性心动过速(NSVT)、持续性室性心动过速(VT)和房性心律失常。对于存储的每一段HREGM序列,检查PM反应的准确性,分为准确(真阳性)、不准确(假阳性)和未确定,并测量HREGM在验证PM诊断中的相对贡献。在4.9±2个月的随访期间,520例患者中有256例(49%)记录到事件,根据HREGM证实为心律失常。总体而言,约34%的房性心动过速反应(ATR)发作被证实是恰当的。类似比例的发作是由对与心律失常无关信号的过度感知引起的,而近12%的发作因持续时间过短无法记录其起始而无法明确。约三分之一的NSVT检测和一半的VT检测为假阳性。心室过度感知(最常见于单极感知时的肌电位干扰)和心房感知不足均被确定为心室事件假阳性检测的来源。双极配置(83%)中真阳性检测的比例显著高于单极配置。在520例PM接受者中,随访3至6个月内,37%的患者通过HREGM证实有各种房性心律失常发作。仅6%的患者被证实有房颤,其中超过50%已有房颤病史。在这个未经过选择的人群中,未被怀疑的房性心律失常的患病率低于先前报道。