Rüppel R, Schlüter C A, Boczor S, Meinertz T, Schlüter M, Kuck K H, Cappato R
University Hospital Eppendorf, Germany.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Nov 15;32(6):1724-30. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00430-6.
The purpose of this study was to use the electrogram storage capabilities of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) to categorize any arrhythmic event during follow-up in a group of patients who had survived an episode of ventricular fibrillation (VF) and to possibly identify clinical predictors of future arrhythmic events.
Little is known about the electrophysiologic characteristics of ventricular arrhythmias recurring during follow-up in survivors of VF as the sole documented arrhythmia at the time of resuscitation.
Forty patients (58+/-10 years; 73% men; left ventricular ejection fraction 42+/-18%; 70% with coronary artery disease) who had survived an episode of VF and subsequently received an ICD capable of intracardiac electrogram recording and storage were followed for 23+/-11 months. In all patients, the arrhythmogenic substrate was investigated by means of programmed electrical stimulation (PES).
Among the 40 patients, 41 episodes of ventricular arrhythmias were documented in 13 patients (33%): 36 episodes of ventricular tachycardias (VT) were recorded in 11 patients (28%) and 5 episodes of VF were recorded in the remaining 2 patients (5%). Age, gender, cardiac disease and left ventricular ejection fraction failed to distinguish between patients with clinical recurrences and patients without. The sensitivity, specificity and positive accuracy of PES were 29%, 63% and 46%, respectively, for prediction of ventricular arrhythmia recurrence; 45%, 70% and 36%, respectively, for prediction of VT; and 50%, 98% and 50%, respectively, for prediction of VF during follow-up.
In survivors of VF receiving ICD therapy, VT is the most common ventricular arrhythmia recorded on device-incorporated electrograms during follow-up. This finding, associated with the relatively well-preserved ventricular function, may account for the ability of these patients to survive at time of the index arrhythmia; the use of antitachycardia pacing as a modality to treat arrhythmia recurrences may contribute to reduce the incidence of shock during follow-up in these patients.
本研究旨在利用植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)的心电图存储功能,对一组曾经历心室颤动(VF)发作且存活下来的患者在随访期间发生的任何心律失常事件进行分类,并可能识别未来心律失常事件的临床预测因素。
对于VF幸存者在随访期间复发的室性心律失常的电生理特征,人们了解甚少,这些VF幸存者在复苏时唯一记录到的心律失常就是VF。
40例患者(年龄58±10岁;男性占73%;左心室射血分数42±18%;70%患有冠状动脉疾病)曾经历VF发作,随后接受了能够进行心内电图记录和存储的ICD,并随访23±11个月。对所有患者均通过程控电刺激(PES)研究致心律失常基质。
40例患者中,13例(33%)记录到41次室性心律失常发作:11例(28%)记录到36次室性心动过速(VT)发作,其余2例(5%)记录到5次VF发作。年龄、性别、心脏病和左心室射血分数无法区分有临床复发的患者和无复发的患者。PES预测室性心律失常复发的敏感性、特异性和阳性预测值分别为29%、63%和46%;预测VT的分别为45%、70%和36%;预测随访期间VF发作的分别为50%、98%和50%。
在接受ICD治疗的VF幸存者中,VT是随访期间通过植入式设备记录的心电图表中最常见的室性心律失常。这一发现,再加上相对保存较好的心室功能,可能解释了这些患者在首次心律失常发作时存活的能力;使用抗心动过速起搏作为治疗心律失常复发的一种方式,可能有助于降低这些患者随访期间休克的发生率。