Gang Yi, Ono Takuya, Hnatkova Katerina, Hashimoto Kenich, Camm A John, Pitt Bertram, Poole-Wilson Philip A, Malik Marek
Department of Cardiological Sciences, St. George's Hospital Medical School, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 0RE, United Kingdom.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003 Jan;26(1P2):394-400. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.00057.x.
This study prospectively investigated 3,118 standard 12-lead ECGs recorded in 1,804 patients, who participated in the Losartan Heart Failure Survival Study--ELITE II clinical trial. After exclusion of patients with rhythms other than sinus, or atrioventricular block, or poor quality ECGs, 986 (703 men, mean age 71 +/- 7 years) with baseline ECGs were retained, of whom 615 patients had follow-up ECGs 4 months after randomization. QT intervals were manually measured with a digitizing board. Heart rate, QRS duration, maximum QT and JT intervals, QT and JT dispersion (the interval ranges across all measurable ECG leads) were analyzed. In the overall population, there were 140 (14%) deaths from all causes, including 119 (12%) cardiac and 59 (6%) sudden deaths during a follow-up of 540 +/- 153 days. The mean heart rate was significantly faster in nonsurvivors than in survivors (77 +/- 16 vs 74 +/- 14 beats/min, P = 0.006), and in patients who died of cardiac death (76 +/- 16 beats/min, P = 0.04 vs survivors). Mean QRS duration was significantly longer in nonsurvivors (107 +/- 25 ms), and in the subgroups who died of cardiac (107 +/- 24 ms) or sudden death (112 +/- 23 ms) than in survivors (99 +/- 24 ms, P < 0.01 for all). The maximum and corrected (QTc) QT intervals were similar for nonsurvivors, regardless of cause of death, and in survivors (P = NS for all comparisons). Significantly shorter maximum and corrected (JTc) JT intervals were observed in victims of any mode of death compared to survivors (P < 0.05 for all). There was no significant difference in QT or JT dispersion between patients with any mode of death and survivors (P > 0.1 for all). Neither losartan nor captopril significantly modified QT or JT dispersion. In conclusion, increased QT dispersion is not associated with increased mortality in patients with heart failure, and is not suitable to examine drug efficacy in these patients.
本研究前瞻性调查了参与氯沙坦心力衰竭生存研究——ELITE II临床试验的1804例患者记录的3118份标准12导联心电图。排除有窦性心律以外的心律、房室传导阻滞或心电图质量差的患者后,保留了986例(703例男性,平均年龄71±7岁)有基线心电图的患者,其中615例患者在随机分组后4个月进行了随访心电图检查。QT间期用数字化板手动测量。分析心率、QRS时限、最大QT和JT间期、QT和JT离散度(所有可测量心电图导联的间期范围)。在总体人群中,在540±153天的随访期间,有140例(14%)患者死于各种原因,包括119例(12%)心源性死亡和59例(6%)猝死。非幸存者的平均心率显著快于幸存者(77±16对74±14次/分钟,P = 0.006),死于心源性死亡的患者也是如此(76±16次/分钟,与幸存者相比P = 0.04)。非幸存者的平均QRS时限(107±25毫秒)以及死于心源性死亡(107±24毫秒)或猝死(112±23毫秒)的亚组患者的平均QRS时限显著长于幸存者(99±24毫秒,所有比较P < 0.01)。无论死亡原因如何,非幸存者的最大QT间期和校正QT间期(QTc)与幸存者相似(所有比较P =无显著性差异)。与幸存者相比,任何死亡方式的受害者的最大JT间期和校正JT间期(JTc)均显著缩短(所有比较P < 0.05)。任何死亡方式的患者与幸存者之间的QT或JT离散度无显著差异(所有比较P > 0.1)。氯沙坦和卡托普利均未显著改变QT或JT离散度。总之,QT离散度增加与心力衰竭患者死亡率增加无关,不适用于检测这些患者的药物疗效。